期刊文献+

2002-2009年国外机构仓储评价研究述评 被引量:14

Retrospect Review of the Assessment of Institutional Repositories Abroad From 2002 to 2009
下载PDF
导出
摘要 机构仓储评价是指运用一定的方法对机构仓储从系统建设、内容组织、服务管理等方面进行多角度的评价,找出机构仓储在实践或服务管理方面的不足,以推动机构仓储向良性轨道发展的过程。其经过了评价先导期与评价实践期的发展历程,主要采用问卷调查法、观察研究法、层次分析法等研究方法。其评价指标为系统指标、内容指标和管理指标3个维度。评价内容包括相关者对机构仓储的认知态度及其存储行为评价、基于机构仓储的电子出版评价、机构仓储的自存档评价、机构仓储的系统化评价等。 Assessment of institutional repositories is an evaluation process with certain methods from aspects of information system, content organizing and service management to identify problems of institutional repositories so as to improve performance of institutional repositories. It goes through phases of pre-assessment and exercise assessment from 2002 to 2009, and the main methods includes questionnaires, observation and analytic hierarchy process. Evaluation index such as system indicators, content indicators and management indicators are involved, and individual cognitive attitude and storage behavior, electronic publishing, self-archiving and systematic evaluation model of institutional repositories are explored as well.
作者 孙坦 陶俊
出处 《图书馆建设》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期6-9,22,共5页 Library Development
关键词 机构仓储 机构仓储评价 数字仓储 Institutional Repository Assessment of institutional repository Digital repository
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Crow R. The Case for Institutional Repositories: a SPARC Position Paper[EB/OL].(2002-08-01 )[2009-12-23].http://www.arl.org/sparc/ bm-doc/ir_final_release_102.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 2Lynch C A.Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age[EB/OL]. (2003-02-01)[2009-12-23]. http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtml. 被引量:1
  • 3Heery R, Anderson S. Digital Repositories Review[EB/OL], (2005- 02-19) [2009-12-20].http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ digital-repositories-review-2005.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 4Lercher A .A Survey of Attitudes about Digital Repositories Among Faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2008 (5): 408--415. 被引量:1
  • 5Xia Jingfeng. Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories: Across Disciplines[J]. The Journal of Academy Librarianship,2007 (6): 647-654. 被引量:1
  • 6Kim Y H, Kim H H. Development and Validation of Evaluation Indicators foi- a Consortium of Institutional Repositories: a Case Study of dColleetion[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Seienee and Teehnology,2008(8):1282-1294. 被引量:1
  • 7Westell M. Institutional Repositories: Proposed Indicators of Success[J]. Library HiTech,2006(2):211-226. 被引量:1
  • 8Shearer K. Institutional Repositories: Towards the Identification of Critical Success Factors[EB/OL]. (2003-10-01)[2009-12-23].https:// dspaee.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/43357/6/CAIS-IR.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9Mark Ware Consulting Ltd. Publisher and Library/Learning Solutions ( PALS ):.Pathfinder Research on Web-Based Repositories[EB/OL]. [2009-03-27]. http://seigate.ncsi.iise.ernet.in/indest-ncsi-ir/ resourees/PALS_report_IR.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10Xia Jingfeng,Sun Li.Factors to Assess Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories[J].Serials Review,2007(2):73-80. 被引量:1

同被引文献225

引证文献14

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部