摘要
《史记》在唐宋古文运动的背景下,成为古文创作的典范,受到古文作家的普遍推崇。然而,陈师道、黄庭坚却提出苏轼"不好《史记》",并对之表示不解。实际上,苏轼与《史记》不仅在文学上有着微妙的渊源关系,而且对《史记》深有研究:他首次比较详细地解释了《史记》将老、庄、申、韩合为一传的深意,从而使道法两家的关系,成为后人进一步深入探索的起点;又首次明确提出了庄子对孔子"阳挤而阴助之"的关系,开启了后世"儒道互补"的研究课题;另外,他对《史记》的史实记载,也有一些很有价值的考证和见解。苏轼的《史记》研究,理应在《史记》研究史上和思想史上占有重要的一页。
SHIJI,or Historical Records,became the highly praised model of prose writing during the Classical Prose Movement in the Tang and Song Dynasties. According to Cheng Shidao and Huang Tingjian,Su Shi ＂didn＇t like Historical Records＂. This remained a puzzle to them. Actually,Su Shi not only had a subtle relation with Historical Records in literature,but also conducted a deep research into it. Su Shi interpreted in detail for the first time why Historical Records put Laozi,Zhuangzi,Shenzi and Hanfeizi together in one biography,which became the foundation for further studies as far as the relationship between Taoism and Legalism was concerned. He also proposed definitely for the first time that Zhuangzi actually helped Confucius though he depreciated him in public,initiating the discourse of the inter-complementation between Taoism and Confucianism. In addition,he also conducted researches on the historical facts in Historical Records,and left some valuable textual researches and opinions. All this indicated that Su Shi played an important role in the academic and intellectual histories of the Historical Records study.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期16-20,共5页
Journal of Historiography
