摘要
流域水权交易、流域政府间生态补偿、排污收费与排污权交易、污水处理设施民营化等策略选择或是采取了产权自由化的设计,或是表现出对竞争机制的倚重,又或是将两者相结合,最终它们均可以增进流域政府间协调,减少流域水资源消费负外部性现象。也正是在这一意义上,可以将它们全部归为一种流域水环境治理的市场型协调机制。此种协调机制对于增进流域合作治理,更深刻的意涵则在于,由市场发挥对水资源乃至其他各类资源配置的基础性作用,才能真正减少和规范流域政府行政权力的活动范围,进而抵制其纵容辖区流域水资源消费负外部性的地方保护行为,最终促进流域政府间横向协调和对负外部性的联合治理。
The marketing mechanism between basin governments highlights the competition system and property right system. The strategic choices are as follows:running water rights transition,building basin-ecological-compensation,putting pollution charge and emission trading into practice,starting privatization in wastewater treatment establishment. In general,these strategic choices of marketing mechanism are useful to regulate the functions of basin government and resist the local protection. So it can enhance the cooperation among basin governments and the cooperative governing of negative externality.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期33-40,共8页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
2009年教育部人文社会科学基金项目"跨省流域治理的政府间横向协调研究"(项目批准号:09YJC630127)的阶段性成果
关键词
流域
负外部性治理
市场型协调
水权交易
生态补偿
Basin
Governing the Negative Externality
Marketing Mechanism
Water Rights Transition
Ecological Compensation