期刊文献+

结构匹配模型的研究现状评述与研究展望——消费者行为学发展的新趋势 被引量:5

Literature Review and Future Research Directions on Strutual Alignment Theory——A New Trend for Consumer Behavior Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,随着市场竞争的日趋激烈以及传播技术的不断发展,消费者做出购买决策前的对比过程变得日趋普遍,因而认知心理学领域研究消费者对比决策过程的模型—结构匹配模型的重要性也更加突出。然而,国内外以结构匹配模型为视角的研究还较有限。尤其国内几乎没有研究关注结构匹配模型在消费者行为学中的应用。因此,文章从消费者行为学的视角对结构匹配模型的相关研究文献进行系统回顾,为进一步研究结构匹配模型在消费者行为中的地位和作用提供了概念基础。 Rapid technological changes and new communication media have facilitated information search on potential alternatives available. Consumers are able to compare between different options, make trade - offs, and arrive at their final decision. Researchers in cognitive psychology developed the structural alignment theory to explain the process underlying consumer comparative decision - making. However, the application of structural alignment theory in consumer behavior research is very limited. Therefore, the current work offers a systematic literature review on structural alignment theory as well as providing directions for future research.
作者 孙瑾
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2010年第4期148-152,共5页 East China Economic Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(09YJC630034)
关键词 结构匹配模型 消费者行为 文献综述 structural alignment theory consumer behavior literature review
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Bettman James,Eric J Johnson,John Payne.Consumer Decision Making[M]//Thomas S.Robertson & Harold H.Kassarjian(Eds.).Handbook of Consumer Behavior[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1991:50-84. 被引量:1
  • 2Tversky Amos.Features of Similarity[J].Psychological Review,1977,84(7):327-352. 被引量:1
  • 3Houston David A,Steven J Sherman,Sara M Baker.Feature Matching,Unique Features,and the Dynamics of the Choice Process:Pre-Decision Conflict and Post-Decision Satisfaction[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1991,27(9):411-430. 被引量:1
  • 4Sanbonmatsu,David M,Frank R Kardes,Bryan D Gibson.The Role of Attribute Knowledge and Overall Evaluations in Comparative Judgment[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,48(2):131-146. 被引量:1
  • 5Markman Arthur B,Douglas L Medin.Similarity and Alignment in Choice[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1995,63(2):117-30. 被引量:1
  • 6Gentner Dedre,Arthur B Markman.Structural Alignment in Analogy and Similarity[J].American Psychologist,1997,52(1):45-56. 被引量:1
  • 7Lindemann Patricia G,Arthur B Markman.Alignability and Attribute Importance in Choice[J].in The Proceedings of The Eighteenth Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society.San Diego,CA:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1996. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhang Shi,Arthur B Markman.Processing Product Unique Features:Alignability and Involvement in Preference Construction[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology,2001,11(1):13-27. 被引量:1
  • 9Markman A B,D Gentner.Splitting the Differences:A Structural Alignment View of Similarity[J].Journal of Memory and Language,1993,32:517-535. 被引量:1
  • 10Gentner Dedre,A B Markman.Structural Alignment in Comparison:No Difference without Similarity[J].Psychological Science,1994,5(3):152-158. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献27

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部