摘要
以往我们对维也纳学派的分析方法多有误解。事实上,石里克的分析方法就是给出哲学论证的方式,即从对一个句子的意义分析入手,尽量考虑到对于理解意义的各种可能情况,然后详细分析每种情况的具体内容,最后表明某种情况或者比其他情况更能说明这个句子的意义。卡尔纳普的方法是通过建立逻辑句法的方式分析我们用于表达思想的命题结构;他对海德格尔的批评完全是对其表达方式的批评,而不是对海德格尔思想的批评。在他们之间的争论中,海德格尔误解了卡尔纳普,但不是通常所认为的那种相反情况。维也纳学派的分析概念来自于弗雷格和罗素,但更重要的是体现了他们对哲学性质的全新理解。
The previous studies of the analytical methods of the Vienna School have some misunderstandings.As a matter of fact,Schlicklisten's analytical method is a mode of philosophical argument,that is,it starts from the analysis of the meaning of a sentence and all the possibilities as well as their concrete contents and finally points out a better interpretation than others.Carnap's method is based on the establishment of logical syntax for analyzing the propositional structure for expressing the ideas.Carnap's criticism of Heidegger aims at Heidegger's ways of expression rather than his ideas.In their arguments,it is Heidegger that misunderstands Carnap rather than vice versa.The analytical methods of the Vienna School originated from Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Arthur William Russell,but they have their new understandings of the nature of philosophy.
出处
《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期17-24,共8页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
