期刊文献+

基于归因理论的冲突类型分析 被引量:13

An Analysis of Conflict Classification Based on Attribution Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有的冲突分类是从冲突的结果出发作出的,这不利于进行冲突管理。本文基于归因理论及其三个维度,在"知觉冲突"的层面上进行全新分类。由于"知觉冲突"尚未演化到实际的冲突,因此,这种分类方式更有利于管理者进行冲突管理。最后,本文提出了针对这种新型冲突分类的未来研究方向以及冲突管理建议。 The current conflict classification is based on result of the conflict,which is not conducive to conflict management. Based on attribution theory and its three dimensions,this paper proposes a new conflict classification at the level of "perceived conflict". As the "perceived conflict" has not yet evolved to the actual conflict,therefore,this classification is more beneficial to manager conflict management. Finally,this paper presents suggestions for future researches and practice of conflict management.
作者 张钢 曹评
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期86-92,共7页 Management Review
关键词 冲突 归因 冲突分类 冲突管理 conflict attribution conflict classification conflict management
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1De Dreu, C.K.W. and L.R. Weingart, Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(4):741-749. 被引量:1
  • 2Jehn, K.A. and C. Bendersky. Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-outcome Relationship[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003,25:187-243. 被引量:1
  • 3Amason, A.C., Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):123-148. 被引量:1
  • 4Amason, A.C. and H.J. Sapienza. The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict[J]. Journal of Management, 1997,23(4):495. 被引量:1
  • 5Jehn, K.A. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2):256-282. 被引量:1
  • 6Jehn, K.A. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3):530-557. 被引量:1
  • 7Amason, A. and D. Schweiger. Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance [J]. International Journal of Conflict Management 1994, 5:239-253. 被引量:1
  • 8Jehn, K.A., G.B. Northcraft, and M.A. Neale. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4):741-763. 被引量:1
  • 9Simons, T., L.H. Pelled, and K.A. Smith. Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(6):662-673. 被引量:1
  • 10Jehn, K.A. and E.A. Mannix. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(2):238-251. 被引量:1

同被引文献205

引证文献13

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部