摘要
以会话"合作原则"为核心的格赖斯会话含义理论引入我国后,引起了我国哲学界、语言学界的广泛关注,同时也一直存在某些异议,争论的焦点之一是"合作"是否是"原则"。这里从合作原则与四准则关系的解读出发,阐述违反准则并不就是违反原则,合作是原则。
With the introduction of Paul Grice＇s conversational implicature theory focused on the Principle of conversation, extensive attention was aroused among philosophers and linguists, along with some arguments.One of the most heated discussions is whether conversation should be treated as a principle or not. Viewing from the relationship between the principle of conversation and its four maxims, the point is that violating the maxim doesn＇t necessarily mean the violation of the principle of conversation and the Principle of Conversation should be treated as a golden rule through communication.
出处
《辽宁教育行政学院学报》
2010年第1期99-101,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Educational Administration Institute
关键词
会话含义理论
合作原则
四准则
Conversational implicature theory Principle of conversation Four maxims Post code 110136
