期刊文献+

吉非替尼治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效及安全性评价 被引量:3

Clinical curative effect and safety evaluation of gefitinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价吉非替尼(gefitinib)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及安全性。方法48例晚期NSCLC患者给予吉非替尼250mg,1/d,口服,疗程2~8个月。回顾性分析其疗效及安全性。结果48例患者有效率35.4%(17/48),其中完全缓解(CR)4.2%(2例)、部分缓解(PR)31.3%(15例);临床控制率为68.8%(33/48),其中有效(CR+PR)35.4%(17例),稳定(SD)33.3%(16例);临床受益反应率为75.0%(36/48)。腺癌组有效率及临床控制率显著优于非腺癌组(P<0.01);男性患者有效率为23.5%(8/34),女性患者有效率为64.3%(9/14),两者比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。胃肠道不良反应发生率为81.3%(39/48),其中腹泻为38.5%(15/39);皮疹发生率为68.8%(33/48)。结论吉非替尼治疗晚期NSCLC疗效较好,不良反应轻微,值得临床进一步推广。 Objective To evaluate clinical curative effect and safty evaluation of gefitinib in the treatment of NSCLC(nonsmall cell lung cancer).Methods Fourty eight patients with advanced stage NSCLC were administrated Gefitinib 250 mg daily orally for 2-8months and analysed its curative effect and safty retrospectively.Results The total effective rate was 35.4%(17/48),including CR of 2 cases(4.2%)and PR of 15 cases(31.3%);the clinical control rate was 68.8%(33/48),including effectiveness of 17 cases(35.4%) and SD of 16 cases(33.3%);the clinical profit reaction rate 75.0%(36/48).The effective rate and the clinical control rate of adenocarcinoma group were superior than that of non-adenocarcinoma group(P0.01);The effective rate in the male patients was 23.5%(8/34),while that in the female patients was 64.3%(9/14),there was significant different in the effective rate between two group(P0.01).The adverse reaction of gastrointestinal tract was 81.3%(39/48),38.5%(15/39)of which was diarrhea;the erythra rate was 68.8%(33/48).Conclusions Gefitinib have better curative effect and insignificant adverse reaction in the treatment of NSCLC,and it is worth being spreaded in clinical practice.
作者 陈美
出处 《中华保健医学杂志》 2010年第1期29-31,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Care and Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 吉非替尼 疗效 安全性 Non-small cell lung cancer Gefitinib Clinical curative effect Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1陈智伟,廖美琳.RECIST标准在肿瘤治疗疗效评价中的应用[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(10):616-618. 被引量:175
  • 2Dy GK, Adjei AA. Novel targets for lung cancer therapy [J]. Part I J Clin Oncol, 2002,20 : 2881-2894. 被引量:1
  • 3Buun PA Jr,Kelly K. New chemotherapeutic agents prolong survival and improve quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer:a review of the literature and future directions [J ]. Clin Cancer Res, 1998.4:1087-1100. 被引量:1
  • 4Barton J, Blackledge G,Wakeling A. Growth factors and their receptor:new targets for prostate cancer therapy[J]. Urology,2001, 58(2 Suppl 1):114-122. 被引量:1
  • 5Ciardiello F,Caputo R,Bianco R,et al. Inhibition of growth factor production and angiogenesis in human cancer cells by ZD1839 (lressa) ,a selective epidermal growlh factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor[J ]. Clin Cancer Res,2001,7: 1459-1465. 被引量:1
  • 6Giaccone G,Herbst RS,Manegold C,et al. Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer :a phase Ⅲ trial-INTACT 1 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2004,22 : 777-754. 被引量:1
  • 7Herbst RS,Giaccone G,Schiller JH,et al. Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer : a phase Ⅲ trial-INTACT 2 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2004,22 : 785-794. 被引量:1
  • 8Birnbaum A ,Ready N. Gefitinib therapy for non-small cell lung cancer [ J ]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2005,6 : 75-81. 被引量:1
  • 9Cohen MH,Williams GA,Sridhara R,et al. FDA drug approval Summary : gefitinib (ZD 1839) (lressa) tablets [ J ]. Oncologist, 2003, 8 : 303-306. 被引量:1
  • 10李龙芸,周彩存,张国淳.非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR突变和基因扩增对吉非替尼疗效的预测价值[J].循证医学,2006,6(1):23-27. 被引量:2

二级参考文献29

  • 1WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment [M].Geneva (Switzerland):World Health Organization,1979. 被引量:1
  • 2Duffaud F,Therasse P.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].Bull Cancer,2000,87(12):869-870. 被引量:1
  • 3James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523-528. 被引量:1
  • 4Mazumdar M,Smith A,Schwartz LH.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2004,57(4):358-365. 被引量:1
  • 5Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179-181. 被引量:1
  • 6Werner-Wasik M,Xiao Y,Pequignot E,et al.Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy:tumor diameter,bidimensional product,and volume.A serial CT sean-based study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):56-61. 被引量:1
  • 7Prasad SR,Saini S,Sumner JE,et al.Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver:comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27(3):380-384. 被引量:1
  • 8Trillet-Lenoir V,Freyer G,Kaemmerlen P,et al.Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic coloreetal cancer:accuracy of the RECIST criteria[J].BrJ Radiol,2002,75(899):903-908. 被引量:1
  • 9Paez JG,Janne PA,Lee JC,et al.EGFR mutations in lung cancer:correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy[J].Science,2004,304:1497-1500. 被引量:1
  • 10Lynch TJ,Bell DW,Sordella R,et al.Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350:2129-2139. 被引量:1

共引文献190

同被引文献93

引证文献3

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部