期刊文献+

经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生486例 被引量:4

Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道等离子双极电切术(PKRP)治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性与临床效果。方法采用英国Gyrus等离子双极电切系统,行经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术486例。结果486例PKRP手术均获成功,手术时间42~110min,平均68min。切除前列腺组织重量25~105g,平均49g。6例输血,无电切综合症发生。术后随访2~13个月,国际前列腺症状评分术前(28.5±3.4)分降至术后(10.4±2.9)分(P<0.05);生活质量评分术前(4.8±0.9)分降至术后(1.9±0.7)分(P<0.05);最大尿流率术前为(7.2±2.6)ml/s升至术后(19.7±3.2)ml/s(P<0.05)。术后出现暂时性尿失禁9例,继发性前列腺出血3例,尿道狭窄5例。结论经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术是治疗良性前列腺增生的一种安全、有效的方法。 Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH}. Methods Four hundred and eighty-six BPH patients were underwent transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with Gyrus plasmakinetic system. Results All of the 486 cases were performed successfully. The preoperative estimated weight of the prostate was from 35g to 125g. The mean operation time was 68min (ranged from 42min to 110min). The mean resected tissues weighted 49g. Six cases needed transfusion and there was no transurethral resection syndrome (TRUS) occurred. All patients were followed up for 2 to 13 months postoperatively, the international prostate symptom score (IPSS} decreased from 28.5±3.4 to 10.4±2.9 {P〈0.05), the quality of life (QOL) decreased from 4.8±0.9 to 1.9±0.7 [P〈0.05), and the maximum flow-rate (Qmax) increased from 7.2 ± 2.6 to 19. 7 ±3.2 ml/s { P(0.05 ). Temporary incontinence occurred in 9 cases postoperatively, the secondary hemorrhage in 3, and urethral strictures in 5. Conclusion PKRP is safe and effective for BPH.
出处 《西部医学》 2010年第3期491-493,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 良性前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术 经尿道电切综合症 Benign prostatic hyperplasia Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate Transurethra/ resection syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Botto H,Lebret T,Barre P,et al.Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device[J].J Endourol,2001,15:313-316. 被引量:1
  • 2王行环,王怀鹏,陈浩阳,刘久敏,罗耀雄,冯自卫,罗则民.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生及膀胱肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(5):318-320. 被引量:267
  • 3Barba M,Leyh H,Hartung R.New technologies in transurethral resection of prostate[J].Curt Opin Urol,2000,10:9-14. 被引量:1
  • 4Wasson JH,Reda DJ,Bruskewitz RC,et al.A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate sympotms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate[J].N Engl J Med,1995,332:75-79. 被引量:1
  • 5Doll HA,Black NA,McPherson K,et al.Mortality,morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostare for benign prostatic hypertrophy[J].J Urol,1992,147:1566-1573. 被引量:1
  • 6Ramsey EW.Benign prostatic hyperplasia:a review[J].Can J Urol,2000,7:1135-1143. 被引量:1
  • 7Patel A,Adshead JM.First clinical experience with new transurethral bipolar prostate electrosurgery resection system:controlled tissue ablation(coblation technology)[J].J Endourol,2004,18:959-964. 被引量:1
  • 8Starkman JS,Santucei RA.Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy:shorter stay,earlier catheter remoral and fewet complieations[J].BJU International,2005,95:69-71. 被引量:1
  • 9Singh H,Desai MR,Shrivastav P,et al.Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate:randomized controlled study[J].J Endourol,2005,19:333-338. 被引量:1
  • 10DeSio M,Autorino R,Quarto G,et al.Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate:a randomized prospective trial[J].Urology,2006,67:69-72. 被引量:1

二级参考文献5

  • 1Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322. 被引量:1
  • 2Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143. 被引量:1
  • 3Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247. 被引量:1
  • 4Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269. 被引量:1
  • 5Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70. 被引量:1

共引文献266

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部