摘要
在当前司法实务中,检察院与法院关于盗窃案件定罪问题存在分歧。盗窃罪与抢夺罪的界分应从"秘密窃取"或"公然夺取"上进行判定,尊重人们生活及司法实践长期以来所形成的认知。对于偷中有骗、骗中有偷的案件,应以财产所有人、保管人是否因陷入认识错误而自愿对财物进行"转移占有"意义上的处分来进行判定。盗窃罪未遂应仅限于盗窃未遂但情节严重的场合,否则虽属于盗窃行为,但不能定盗窃(未遂)罪。
In the present judicial practice, there are divergences in thefts between courts and prosecutorial office. Crimes of theft and pillage ought to be differentiated according to secret thefting or overt snatching otherls property, and we ought to respect cognitions coming from ordinary life and judicial practice all along. As to the case mixing fraud into theft, we ought to judge it according to whether the victim is willing to deliver the property because of his own misunderstanding. Attempted crime of theft must be limited to the condition of being aborted in thefe with serious plot, otherwise, the offender can not be convicted the attempted crime of theft.
出处
《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2010年第1期27-31,共5页
Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition
基金
最高人民检察院重点项目(编号:GJ2005B08)
关键词
盗窃罪
分歧
抢夺罪
诈骗罪
未遂罪
crime of theft
divergence
crime of pillage
crime of fraud
attempted crime
