摘要
盗窃罪与抢夺罪的界分,有新旧两种标准。"旧说"以行为人主观上认为是秘密或公然的偷抢行为作为界分标准,"新说"以是否以对物平和的方式抢夺他人紧密占有的财物、具有致人伤亡可能性作为界分标准。公开盗窃超出盗窃罪所能容纳的社会危害性的范畴,符合抢夺罪的构成要件,刑法中也有相应佐证;"旧说"主客观具有一致性,不会扩大抢劫罪的犯罪圈,适应我国当前复杂的刑法实益。
There are two different standards between theft and plunder theoretically. The old standard believes the key difference is whether the behavior is in public or in secret,but the new standard argues the difference is whether someone peacefully transfers properties possessed by others to himself and whether someone forcibly seizure properties closely possessed by someone else in the way of imposing violence on properties with the possibility of incurring hurt or death. Theft in public is beyond the scope of theft that could include its nature of social harm; this behavior is consistent with criminal elements of plunder. The old standard is subjective and objective consistency,and will not expand the criminal scope of robbery,which adapt to the complex criminal beneficial in our country.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2013年第6期38-40,共3页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
盗窃
抢夺
公然盗窃
界限
theft
plunder
theft in public
difference
