摘要
探讨了安诺其ECO活性染料对纯棉平绒织物的湿蒸短流程和轧烘轧蒸染色工艺,测试了染色织物表面深度K/S值、固色率、提升力以及染色牢度等性能指标,比较了两种染色工艺的差别.试验结果表明:使用安诺其ECO活性染料,实施湿蒸短流程染色,缩短了工艺流程,使染料具有较好的提升性,尤其130℃湿蒸短流程工艺具有较高织物表观深度K/S值,牢度与传统轧烘轧蒸工艺相当.湿蒸短流程染色工艺无需食盐,节约了染化料,降低了废水处理的难度,但湿蒸短流程工艺固色率较传统轧蒸轧烘工艺略低,另外,100℃蒸汽湿蒸工艺仅适合染较浅的颜色.对轧染节能减排、环保染色有待于做进一步探索.
Short wet-steam （S-W-S） process and pad-dry-pad-steam （P-D-P-S） dyeing process of cott- on panne fabric with Anozol ECO reactive dye were discussed.The appearance color deepness of dyed fabric K/S value,fixed rate, felevating power and color fastness were measured and the difference of two dyeing processes was compared. The results showed that Anozol ECO reactive dyeing with short wet-steaming process short- ened the process and made the dye have good building up property. Especially the short wet-steam process at 130℃ had higher appearance color deepness K/S value, and the color fastness was similar with that of the tradi- tional pad-dry-pad-steam process. Short wet-steam dyeing process does not need salt, save dyes and chemi- cals, reduce the difficulty of waste water treatment. However, the fixation rate of short wet-steam process was slightly lower than that of the conventional pad-dry-pad-steam process. Moreover, short wet-steam process at 100 ℃only fitted for tint color dyeing. Energy-saving emission reduction and green dyeing of pad dyeing was further discussed.
出处
《印染助剂》
CAS
北大核心
2010年第2期39-42,共4页
Textile Auxiliaries
关键词
轧染
活性染料
湿蒸短流程
轧烘轧蒸
平绒
pad dyeing
reactive dyes
short wet-steam process
pad-dry-pad-steam
panne
