期刊文献+

不同的大学治理方式 被引量:7

Different Models for University Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 投资不能构成政府控制和干预大学的理由,国家或政府最优先的责任是"培养好的研究环境"。德美两国的大学治理都围绕保障大学自治和学术自由,以高度一致的根本理念和不太相同的表现形式,获得了大致相同的繁荣结果。在中国,无限政府的观念正处在深刻的向有限政府的变化中。但观念的问题并未完全解决。大学的自由与独立,首先是国家的需要,唯有学者们、大学和国家共同意识到这一点,大学才可能是先进的。 Investment is not the reason for government to control and to interfere in university. The prior duty of nation or government is to foster good research environment. The university governance of both German and America are centered on the assurance of university autonomy and freedom. And the prosperous results are in essence the same. In China, the concept of unlimited not solved completely. University can only be freedom and independence of university first is governments is changing to limited government. Bit the idea issue is advanced when all of scholars, university and nation realize that the the needs of nation.
作者 张楚廷
出处 《大学教育科学》 CSSCI 2010年第1期109-112,共4页 University Education Science
关键词 大学治理 大学自治 学术自由 政府干预 university governance university autonomy academic freedom government intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1Kerr Clark, Expanding Access and Changing Missions: The Federal Role in U.S. Higher Education [ EB/OL ].http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=8733813& sid = 6&Fmt = 3&clientId=3489&RQT = 309&VName=PQD, 2006-03-11. 被引量:1
  • 2张维平等.美国教育法研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2004.29. 被引量:1
  • 3Frederick Rudolph. The American College and University: A History.New York: Random House Inc,1962. 253, 261-262, 265. 被引量:1
  • 4Roger Geiger. Research and Relevant Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1993.59. 被引量:1
  • 5Roger Geiger. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1993.6,7-8,9,18, 25,186. 被引量:1
  • 6劳伦斯·E.格兰迪克斯,杰奎琳·E.金.联邦政府与高等教育[A].菲利普·阿特巴赫主编.21世纪美国高等教育:社会、政治、经济的挑战[C].王九逵等译.台北:高等教育出版社,2003.175-176. 被引量:1
  • 7James C. Palmer. State Appropriations for Higher Education, 2005-6 [ E B/OL ] .http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i 19/ 19a02701.htm.2006-02-25. 被引量:1
  • 8William A. Kaplin and Barbara A. Lee. The Law of Higher Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco,1995. 711-714. 被引量:1
  • 9"Bologna Process Stocktaking Report London 2007",第11-37页. 被引量:1
  • 10“Access” is defined according to the Lisbon Recognition Convention, “Access: the right of qualified candidates to apply and to be considered for admission”. 被引量:1

共引文献38

同被引文献97

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部