摘要
行政协议是现代行政领域解决跨部门与跨地区行政合作问题而出现的新形式,为世界各国所采用;但其法律性质是什么,各国理论界与实务界的观点并不太一致。美国对行政协议的关注旨在探究行政协议的本质及其制定如何能够合法,而中国则侧重于强调其契约性,并未对行政协议的内容进行程序性规制。那种认为行政协议就是行政契约的观点值得商榷,该观点并未全面揭示行政协议的本质,这对于从法律上规制行政协议,使其充分发挥功效是不利的。
Administrative agreement, a newly-devised Way to solve the issues concerning trans-department or trans-regional cooperation in modern administrative field, has been adopted by many countries. However. opinions of academics and practitioners in different countries differ as to the implication of administrative agreement in law. What American scholars are interested in is how to study its essence and how to enter into it so as to enable it effective, while Chinese counterparts are endeavoring to study its contractual features rather than regulating procedurally the contents of administrative agreement. The argument that maintains an administrative agreement is nothing but an administrative contract is inadequate for it fails to afford an overall description of the essence of administrative agreement, which will produce an adverse effect on regulating administrative agreement to stimulate its full function.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期179-185,共7页
Modern Law Science
关键词
行政协议
行政契约
规则制定
行政立法
administrative agreement
administrative contract
rulemaking
administrative law
