摘要
目的:比较阿替卡因与利多卡因在上尖牙拔髓术中的局部麻醉效果。方法:共纳入94例患者,共102颗需在局部麻醉下进行根管治疗的活髓上尖牙。所有患者随机分为阿替卡因组和利多卡因组,分别用阿替卡因或利多卡因进行粘膜下浸润麻醉。对两组患者在麻醉注射时、拔髓时的疼痛程度以及麻醉持续时间进行分析比较。结果:阿替卡因组局部浸润麻醉时注射疼痛明显小于利多卡因组,拔髓时疼痛程度明显小于利多卡因组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);阿替卡因组麻醉维持时间显著长于利多卡因组(P<0.05)。结论:阿替卡因局部渗透力强,起效快,维持时间长,效果明显优于利多卡因。
Objective：To compare the anesthetic effect of articaine and lidocaine in the pulp extirpation of vital maxillary canine. Methods： In total, 94 patients with 102 root canals needed to be administered by root canal treatment were enrolled into the study and randomly divided into two groups, the artieaine group and lidocaine group. The magnitudes of pain during the injection and pulp extirpation as well as the duration of anesthesia were compared between the two groups. Results： In the articaine group, the magnitudes of pain during the injection and pulp extirpation were significantly less than those in the lidocaine group （P〈0.05）. The duration of anesthesia of the articaine group was also longer than that of the lidocaine group （P〈 0.05）. Conclusion： The anesthetic effect of articaine is better than lidoeaine and artieaine is suit for the pulp extirpation of vital maxilaary canine.
出处
《中国临床医学》
2009年第6期960-961,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词
阿替卡因
利多卡因
上颌尖牙
拔髓术
Articaine
Lidocaine
Maxillary canine
Pulp extirpation
