摘要
朝鲜诗人申钦所作《次陈子昂〈感遇〉三十六首》基本上继承了陈子昂《感遇》诗的主题思想,其主题集中鲜明,较之陈子昂,在主题范围上有所缩小,究之原因,根源于两人诗学主张的不同,两人诗学主张的不同也导致了两人诗歌风格的不同。另外,申钦次感遇诗继承了陈子昂感遇诗"兴寄"、"以虚字入诗"的表现手法及运用叠字、使用疑问句式的语言技巧,而且善于发现陈诗中的某些不足并加以完善,在陈子昂原诗基础上有所超越和创新。
Korean poet Shenqin's 36 responsory poems basically inherited the main idea of Chen Zi’ang's poems Signing for My Experience. The main idea of Shenqin's responsory poems was pinpoint and clear,but was narrower in scale than Chen Ziang'spoems. The reason is probally that the two poets’ poetic viewpoints were different,which led to the different styles of their poems. On the other hand,Shenqin's responsory poems inherited the technique of expression such as metaphor and the use of reduplication and language skills of the use of interrogative sentence-type adopted in Chen Zi’ang's poems. Moreover,Shenqin was adept in finding several shortcomings in Chen Zi’ang's poems and improved them,and as a result,Shenqin's responsory poems made some improvement and innovation on the basis of Chen Zi’ang's 38 poems.
出处
《南京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第6期64-68,共5页
Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology：Social Sciences
关键词
申钦
次韵诗
陈子昂
感遇诗
Shenqin
responsory poems
Chen Zi’ang
Signing for My Experiences
