摘要
目的:比较传统凿骨劈冠法与改良涡轮机法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙时,对病人术后生活质量的影响。方法:600例下颌阻生第三磨牙病例,其中300例使用传统的凿骨劈冠法拔除,另300例使用改良涡轮机法拔除,采用改良的术后症状严重度量表(PoSSe)综合量化评价病人拔牙术后的生活质量,将两组分数进行分析比较。结果:改良涡轮机法与凿骨劈冠法的PoSSe分值分别为26.9865±15.3992和19.9381±13.1045。改良涡轮机法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的PoSSe分值明显低于传统的凿骨劈冠法(P<0.05)。结论:与凿骨劈冠法相比,改良涡轮机法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙对病人术后生活质量影响较小。
AIM ： To investigate the effect on postoperative quality of life of extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth using turbine drill and dental chisel. METHODS： The 600 examples of impacted mandibular third molar were divided into 2 group with each of 300 examples. In group A the turbine drill was used to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. In group B the dental chisel was used to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. We use the PoSSe Scale to measure the severity of symptoms after extraction of third molars, and compare the scores. RESULTS： The PoSSe scores in group A and B was 26. 9865 ±15. 3992 and 19. 9381 ± 13. 1045. The PoSSe scores in group A was lower （ P 〈 0.05 ）. CONCLUSION ： Turbine drill and new instruments method is superior to dental chisel method in the extraction of impacted madibular wisdom teeth.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2009年第12期702-705,共4页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词
阻生第三磨牙
牙拔除术
涡轮机
劈冠法
生活质量
器域
impacted mandibular third molar
tooth extraction
turbine drill
dental chisel
quality of life
instruments
