摘要
与德国等国家和地区相比,我国《物权法》规定的善意取得制度有明显的优先保护所有权的倾向。由此,我国的善意买受人承担着更多的交易风险,其中包括以善意取得各个要件事实证明责任为主的诉讼风险。其原因是我国的占有制度的性质有别于其他国家和地区;此外,在物权行为有因性和无因性之间做出的不同的政策性选择,以及由此决定的善意取得制度立法精神的不同,也是造成这种差异的重要原因。
In contrast with the laws in Germany and other states, the provision concerning bona fide acquisition in China＇s Real Right Act obviously intends to consider as its priority guarding the safety of property. As such, a Chinese purchaser in good faith seems to have to run much more risks of transaction, including sustaining the burden in litigation of proving his/her having met all requirements of good faith, paid reasonable consid-eration and fulfilled occupancy or registration, and bearing the risk of losing the case. On the contrary, in Ger- many and elsewhere it is the man who challenges good faith acquisition and applies for replevying his property to bear the onus probandi to prove purchaser＇ s malevolence. This discrepancy mainly lies in the dissimilarity between China＇ s legislative intention and that of Germany and elsewhere. Further, adoption of disparate systems of possession and dingliches rechtsgeschaft also contributes a great deal.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期111-118,共8页
Modern Law Science
基金
2009年度国家社科基金项目"诉权的法哲学研究--基于和谐社会中公民权利保障的视角"(09CFX004)
2008年度河南省教育厅人文社科项目"民事再审事由程序功能解析"(2008-GH-030)
关键词
交易安全
所有权安全
举证责任
败诉风险
transaction security
property security
onus probandi
risk of losing lawsuit
