摘要
公诉权的滥用包括滥用起诉权和滥用不起诉权。权力的滥用必然引起权力的制约。通过对两大法系主要国家起诉权制约机制和不起诉权制约机制的分析和比较,发现职权主义模式和当事人主义模式存在差异:普通法系国家公诉机关拥有广泛的裁量不起诉的权力且不存在相应的制约机制,而大陆法系国家检察官的不起诉裁量权范围很有限且受到严格控制;两大法系都存在检察官起诉权的制约机制,而且皆采用司法控制模式,但仅形似而实不似。
Abuse of public prosecution includes abuse of prosecution and abuse of non - prosecution. Abuse of the power causes restriction of the power absolutely. Through the analysis and comparison of the control system to abuse of prosecution and abuse of non - prosecution in different eontries of the two geneology of law, the paper shows that inquisitorial Model and Adversary is different, in which common law countries have wide discretion prosecution organ of power and the action does not exist, and the corresponding mechanism of continental law system country prosecutors discretion scope is limited and controled strictly, there are two major legal authouity restriction mechanism, prosecutors charged,, and using the judicial control mode.
出处
《西安财经学院学报》
2009年第6期114-120,共7页
Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics
关键词
起诉权
不起诉权
裁量权
司法控制
prosecution
non - prosecution
discretion judicial control
judicial control
