摘要
经济法运用整体主义的方法分析市场失灵的原因,指出为了公共利益,作为公众利益的代言人的国家应当对经济进行干预。公共选择理论使用个人主义的分析方法,利用经济人假设,政治是交易过程,政府也是经济人,它不会从抽象的公共利益出发制定政策,只追求自身利益最大化。公共选择理论的个人主义分析方法、经济人假设和交易的政治观,动摇了国家干预经济的正当性,对经济法构成了严重挑战。
Analyzing the reason for market failure by integral methodology, economic law points out that government shall intervene the economy for public interest as a public speaker. Utilizing individualism and the hypothesis of economic man, public choice theory reckons that politics means a certain market exchange in which government, as an economic man, identically maximizing self-interest in process of making policies not on base of abstract public interest. The individualism and the hypothesis of economic man, as well as exchange-like polities, fluctuate the justifiability of governmentintervening economy, seriously challenge the economic law.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第11期147-151,共5页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
公共选择
经济法
挑战
public choice
economic law
challenge