期刊文献+

后功能主义理论与欧洲一体化 被引量:12

Postfunctionalism and the European Integration
原文传递
导出
摘要 后功能主义是当前欧洲一体化理论的新发展。在继承和修正新功能主义理论的基础上,它从研究欧盟的大众意见和政党政治入手,分析了国内政治化进程对欧洲一体化发展的重要性。后功能主义理论以认同为核心变量解释了20世纪90年代以来欧盟的全民公决、政党冲突等新现象。它对欧洲一体化的理论和实践有着重要意义,但在以下四个方面依然存在一些局限:首先,后功能主义对于政治化进程的看法似乎过于悲观;其次,后功能主义讨论的政治化进程只限于成员国国内,而没有涉及跨国层面;再次,认同因素在政治化进程中的核心位置值得商榷;最后,后功能主义虽然指出了"政治化"带来的冲突,但并没有为此给出解决方案。 Postfunctionalism,a new development of European integration theories,both inherits from and revises the neofunctionalism. Starting with studies on EU public opinions and party politics,it analyzes the impacts of domestic politicization on the European integration process,and using identity as a key variable,it explains some of the new phenomena emerged in the EU since the 1990s. Postfunctionalism is of essential significance for both the theories and practice of European integration,but some limitations still exist. First,it seems that it holds a too pessimistic view about the politicization process. Second,the politicization process that it pays attention to is only confined to that at the domestic but not at the transnational level. Thirdly,the key position of identity in the politicization process is controversial. And finally,although postfunctionalism points out the conflicts resulted from the politicization process,it doesn’t offer corresponding solutions.
作者 李明明
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期33-45,共13页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, "A Posffunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus" , British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 1 - 25, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 27 October, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 2Philippe C, Schmitter, "On the Way to a Post-functionalist Theory of European Integration", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 211 -215, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 3Tanja A. Borzel and Thomas Risse, "Revisiting the Nature of the Beast -Politicization, European Identity, and Posffunetionalism: A Comment on Hooghe and Marks", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 217 -220, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 4Hanspeter Kriesi, "Rejoinder to Lisbet Hooghe and Gary Marks,A Posffunctionedist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus ", British Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 221 - 224, First Published Online by Cambridge University Press, 10 November, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 5Ben Rosamond, Theories of European Integration, London: Macmillan Press Ltd. , 2000, p. 50. 被引量:1
  • 6Ernst B. Haas, "Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-functionalism?", in Thomas Christiansen et al. , The Social Construction of Europe, London : SAGE Publication, 2001, pp. 22 - 31. 被引量:1
  • 7Philippe C. Schmitter, " Neo-Neofunctionalism", in Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez eds. , European In- tegration Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 45. 被引量:1
  • 8Borzel Tanja ed. , "Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of Neofunctionalism", Special Issue, Journal of European Public Policy, No. 2, Vol. 12, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 9Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, "The Neofunctionalists Were(almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration", Webpapers, Constitutionlism & Governance beyond the State, No. 5,2005, http://www. bath. ac. uk/esml/conWEB/Conweb% 20papers -filestore/conweb5 -2005. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10David Mitrany, "The Functional Approach to World Organization", International Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 3, July 1948. 被引量:1

同被引文献229

引证文献12

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部