摘要
在紧急避险的正当性根据问题上,我国习惯将排除社会危害性作为紧急避险理论的建构基础,这使得一些问题得不到合理解释,甚至出现自相矛盾的尴尬局面。而照搬国外理论与我国现有的犯罪构成理论又不相符,因此可以期待可能性说为一般原则,同时以法益衡量说为补充,是紧急避险正当性的理论根据所在。其中,对期待可能性理论的运用是有前提的,即我们必须在区分东西方刑法理论及其体系差别的基础上,运用我国刑法理论对其进行消化、吸收与改造后方可适用。
In terms of the legitimate evidence of the act of rescue,Chinese scholars take the removing of social endangerment as their theoretical base,which is,however,inadequate in providing answers to some questions,and even not consistent with itself.However,theories directly borrowed from other countries may not be compatible with the existing crime constitution theory in China.Therefore,the author hereby proposes that it is better to take the anticipated possibility theory as the general principle and the legal interest measuring theory as supplement, which arecombined to compose the theoretical base of legitimacy of the act of rescue. However, as for the use of anticipated possibility theory, a premise must be involved, that is, to make necessary modification in order for it to suit our Chinese criminal system, since great distinctions exist between both Western and Eastem criminal law theories and systems.
出处
《成都电子机械高等专科学校学报》
2009年第3期67-70,共4页
Journal of Chengdu Electromechanical College
关键词
紧急避险
正当性根据
期待可能性
法益衡量
Act of rescue
Legitimacy evidence
Anticipated possibility
Legal interest measuring
