摘要
学界讨论热烈的“期待可能性”在司法实践中却遭受冷遇。造成如此现象的症结在于,司法实践中的定罪量刑以法律规范为适用依据,而“期待可能性”只是阶层犯罪构成理论中的理论性要件要素。实际上,“期待可能性”之精华,不在于其作为阶层犯罪构成理论要件要素的形式表现,而在于其所具有的社会危害性和人身危险性有无与大小的实质内容。据此,若将“期待可能性”做“去虚求实”的平易化释读与规范化对接,则可以解决其在司法实践中受冷遇问题。具体是,将“期待可能性”所指向的社会危害性和人身危险性有无或大小的事实,根据刑法关于定罪要件或量刑情节的立法规定或司法规范,予以罪责免除或减轻评价与定罪量刑运用,如此路径方可促进刑法研究与司法实践的良性互动。
the anticipated possibility is heatedly discussed in the criminal law theory,but cheerless in the judicial practice.Because conviction and sentencing are based on legal norms in judicial practice but not the anticipated possibility as the theoretical element in the class crime theory.Actually,the essence of the anticipated possibility is existence and extent of social harmfulness and personal danger which reflected by the anticipated possibility,but not the formal expression of elements in the class crime theory.Hence,popularizing the anticipated possibility and finding the legal basis for it,we can solve the problem.Specifically,evaluating,criminating and sentencing the facts about the existence or extent of social harmfulness and personal danger pointed to by the anticipated possibility,according to the criminal law’s legislative provisions or judicial norms on convictions or sentencing circumstances.
作者
石经海
苏桑妮
SHI Jinghai;SU Sangni
出处
《刑法论丛》
2021年第2期340-374,共35页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
期待可能性
去虚求实
社会危害性
人身危险性
Anticipated Possibility
Simplification
Social Harmfulness
Personal Danger
