期刊文献+

巨大儿的分娩方式及其对妊娠结局的影响 被引量:13

Effect of delivery modes on pregnant outcomes of giant infants
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较足月巨大儿与正常体重儿的分娩方式、母婴并发症,探讨巨大儿的不同分娩方式与妊娠结局的关系。方法:回顾性调查哈尔滨市16所医院在2000年1月1日~2005年12月31日分娩的单胎、无出生缺陷、足月(非早产、过期产)活产的巨大儿和正常体重儿的产妇病案(其中包含新生儿病案),比较2138例巨大儿和18233例正常体重儿的分娩方式与妊娠结局。结果:巨大儿组的剖宫产率、产妇住院天数、产妇产后出血比例、新生儿窒息比例高于正常体重儿组。巨大儿组的阴道助产率(7.51%)高于正常体重儿组(5.60%),但无统计学意义。分娩巨大儿的产妇产后出血比例、巨大儿窒息比例均与分娩方式无关。结论:足月巨大儿也具有较高的母婴并发症,故应探索并使用正确的产前预测巨大儿的方法,产时给于充分重视,适时正确处理,适当放宽剖宫产指征,降低母婴并发症。 Objective: To compare the delivery modes and complications of mothers and babies between giant infants and normal birth weight infants, explore the relationship between different delivery modes and pregnant outcomes. Methods: Maternal and neonatal records in 16 hospitals of Harbin from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2005 were reviewed. All singletons, without malformations, birth weights ≥2 500 g , full -term pregnancy were included in the study, the delivery modes and pregnant outcomes were compared between 2 138 giant infants and 18 233 normal birth weight infants. Results: The rates of caesarean section, neonatorum asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage and hospitalization day in giant infants group were higher than those in normal birth weight infants group. There was no difference in the rate of vaginal delivery be- tween giant infants group (7. 51% ) and normal birth weight infants group (5.60%), and there was no correlation between postpartum hemorrhage, neonatorum asphyxia and delivery modes. Conclusion: Full - term giant infants have high incidence of complications, proper prognostic methods and appropriate treatment, caesarean section may reduce the complications of mothers and babies.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第23期3244-3246,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 巨大儿 分娩方式 分娩并发症 Giant infants Delivery modes Obstetric complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bergmann RL, Richter R, Bergmann KE et al. Secular trends in neonatal macrosomia in Berlin: influences of potential determinants [ J] . Paedi- atr Perinat Epidemiol, 2003, 17 (3) : 244. 被引量:1
  • 2周丽萍.1998-2005年庐阳区新生巨大儿资料分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(19):2668-2669. 被引量:7
  • 3卞晓云,钟建新,吴红荷,陈坚,王兴伟,陈小宁.南通地区近20年巨大儿发生率及危险因素变化的分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(11):83-85. 被引量:19
  • 4Jolly MC, Sebire N J, Harris JP et al. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350, 311 pregnancies [J] . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 111 (1) : 9. 被引量:1
  • 5Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM et al. Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk [ J ] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188 (5) : 1372. 被引量:1
  • 6乐杰主编.妇产科学(M].第5版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:148. 被引量:1
  • 7Boulet SL, Salihu HM, Alexander GR. Mode of delivery and birth outcomes of macrosomic infants [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 24 (6) : 622. 被引量:1
  • 8Gregory KD, Henry OA, Ramicone E et al. Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery [ J ].Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 92 (4) : 507. 被引量:1
  • 9Lipscomb KR, Gregory K, Shaw K. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern Califomia experience [ J] . Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 85 (4) : 558. 被引量:1

二级参考文献15

共引文献22

同被引文献100

引证文献13

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部