期刊文献+

排污权交易若干问题之思考——以水污染为视角 被引量:3

On Some Issues of Emissions Trading——Perspective of Water Pollution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 排污权交易制度不明确或回避排污权财产权属性与排污者和政府博弈有关,也涉及各国环境权益。可量化的环境权益构成排污权交易对象,这种环境权益既有货币特征也显商品属性,对其性质把握应以设计能促进环境保护的交易制度为最终依归。针对水污染物排放权交易需要,细化总量控制及分解方式。排污许可证是官方授权的排污许可,排污权证是依法证明减排环境权益凭证。拥有排污许可证构成交易前提,但获得排污权证交易才可能发生。排污者拥有排污权是对其建设项目进行环境影响评价的法定条件。 Regimes establishing trading system are generally silent as to the legal character of emission right,which is pertinent to the relationship between the pollutant emmissioner and the government, or involved in environmental interest among different countries. Emission reduction interest, as the trading object, has shown many similarities to currencies and commodities. Understanding and grasping its properties and characteristics is helpful to shape the design of trading mechanisms. Aiming at actual instance of water pollutants emission right, there will be an elaboration of cap setting and its process. Pollutant emission permit is not transferred because of its general function. The possessing of permit just provides a precondition for trading. The trading does not occur until holding emission reduction interest certificates. Holding emission right is the legal condition for EIA.
作者 王清军
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期67-74,共8页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文社会科学项目"生态补偿机制疑难问题法律研究"(07JA820004)
关键词 环境权益 排污许可证 排污权证 部门合作 environmental interest pollutant emission permit emission reduction interest certificates cooperation between departments
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Michael A.Livermore.Cause or cure? Cost-Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Gridlock[J].New York:University Environmental Law Journal,2008(17):107-133. 被引量:1
  • 2European Environmental Agency.Application of the Emission Trading Directive by EU Member State[M].UK:Cambridge University Press 2007:173-176. 被引量:1
  • 3陈慈阳著..环境法总论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:551.
  • 4Timonthy Heinmiller,The Politics of "cap and trad-e"Policies[J].Natural Resources Journal.2007(Spring):273-274. 被引量:1
  • 5Gary D.Libecap.Open-Acess Losses and Delay in the Assignment of Property Rights[J]Arizona Law Review,2008(summer):379-408. 被引量:1
  • 6Matthieu Wemaere&Charlotte Streck.Legal Ownership and Nature of Kyoto Units and EU.Allowances[M]∥David.Legal Aspects of Implementing the Kyoto Protocal Mechanisms:Making kyoto work.UK:Oxford University Press,2005:35-54. 被引量:1
  • 7Jillian Button.Carbon:Commodity or Currency?T-he Case for an International Carbon Market Based on the Currency Model[J].The Harvard EnvironmentalLaw Review.2008(Volume32):577. 被引量:1
  • 8The EU Emission Trading Directive:Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls[EB/OL].(2004-04-24)[2009-06-15].http:∥www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-04-24.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9蔡守秋,张建伟.论排污权交易的法律问题[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2003,43(5):98-102. 被引量:93
  • 10邓海峰,罗丽.排污权制度论纲[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2007,25(6):76-83. 被引量:37

二级参考文献23

共引文献120

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部