摘要
新《律师法》与《刑事诉讼法》存在立法性冲突,导致新《律师法》施行后的执法性报复。学术界和实务界对新《律师法》的法律效力见解不一。根据《宪法》、《立法法》等规定,全国人大与其常委会的关系不能成为确定新《律师法》与《刑事诉讼法》法律位阶关系之根据。全国人大与其常委会不属于《立法法》中的同一机关,但"视为"同一机关具有现实合理性。全国人大常委会法制工作委员会对新《律师法》法律效力的答复存在形式上的不妥当性与内容上的不合法性。应通过个案解决的立法技术以及法律适用规则的完善,为新《律师法》与《刑事诉讼法》的立法性冲突提供解决对策,也为国内法律冲突提供制度化化解路径。
The legislative conflict between Lawyers Law and Criminal Procedure Law has led to enforcement revenges since the enactment of the new Lawyers Law. On this issue, the academic and practice circles hold different views. According to the Constitution and Legislation Law, the relationship between the NPC and its standing committee is not to be taken as the basis for deciding the rank of a law. The NPC and its standing committee are not identical but should be ＂considered＂ to be identical. However, the reply from the law comittee of the NPC standing committee on the force of Lawyers Law lacks legitimacy in terms of form as well as content. The solution to this problem lies in the improvement of both legistive devices and the application of law, which can also provide an insititutionalized approach to solving the conflicts bwtween the domestic laws.
出处
《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期29-35,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(06SFB2035)
关键词
律师法
刑事诉讼法
立法
法律冲突
法律适用规则
Lawyers Law
Criminal Procedure Law
legislation
conflict of law
rules of application of law
