期刊文献+

AP1000与EPR专设安全系统的差异性比较和分析 被引量:12

Comparison and analysis on the differences between AP1000 and EPR engineered safety system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以美国西屋公司开发的先进压水堆(AP1000)和法德两国联合开发的欧洲压水堆(EPR)为典型代表的第三代核电技术都在专设安全系统的设计上进行了革新或改进,旨在提高核电站的总体安全水平和可利用率。本文简要介绍了AP1000和EPR专设安全系统的组成和特点,比较了两者之间的差异,并分析了这些差异对于核电站安全、设备可靠性及成本控制的影响。 The third generation nudear power technology, represented by Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (AP1000) designed by Westinghouse and European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) designed and developed by France and Germany, makes evolution or improvement on the engineered safety system in order to enhance the overall safety and availability of NPP. This article gives a brief introduction on the composition and features of the engineered safety system in AP1000 and EPR, makes comparison between the two, and analyzes the impact of the differences on safety, equipment reliability and cost control of NPP.
出处 《中国核电》 2009年第2期166-171,共6页 China Nuclear Power
关键词 核电站 AP1000 EPR 专设安全系统 差异性 Nuclear power plant, AP1000, EPR, engineered safety system, difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献12

同被引文献69

引证文献12

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部