摘要
会见权既是嫌疑人权利也是辩护律师的权利。它有助于嫌疑人辩护能力的提高和律师辩护活动的展开。在司法实践中,会见权行使走入困境:会见启动难,会见需经批准成为常态,会见的主体、时间和次数受限,会见受监督。2007年修订后的《律师法》对会见制度作出了改革,确立了会见时仅凭"三证"规则,明确了"会见不受监听"规则。但其效果并不佳。而这一切的关键原因在于侦查组织和侦查程序的"诉讼化"的缺失。因此,我国会见制度再改革的重点也就在于,相应的侦查辩护救济体系的建立、看守所的中立化以及侦查阶段司法审查的建立。
The right of meeting provision belongs to the suspect, and also belongs to the lawyer of the suspect. The right is helpful to protect the suspect＇s right and the lawyer＇s right. In the practice of China, the right meets many difficulties. It is difficulty for lawyer to meet the suspect. The subject, time and times of meeting is strictly limited. And there are many subject supervise the course of meeting. The reformer of law has got many achievements, but there are many problems in China Criminal Procedure Law. The effect of the reform is limited. The key cause of these problems is the shortcoming of judicial review to its procedure. So the key to the reform to China Criminal Procedure is to establish the system of remedy and the system of judicial review to investigation course.
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第5期77-86,共10页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词
会见权
辩护
司法审查
meeting provision
defend
judicial review
