期刊文献+

双宾结构和介词与格结构启动中的语义启动 被引量:22

Semantic priming in the priming of English dative constructions
原文传递
导出
摘要 双宾结构和介词与格结构是结构启动研究中最常考察的一对句法结构。它们之间不仅存在结构差异,还存在语义差异。如果存在语义启动,那么二者之间的语义差别势必影响结构启动效应。针对这一假设,本研究通过图片描述任务考察了中国英语学习者的双宾/介词与格结构的启动情况。结果表明,启动过程是结构启动和语义启动共同作用的结果,离开了语义条件的单纯的句法结构启动是不存在的。 The most frequently used syntactic structure in structural priming studies involves twoalternative dative constructions. Double-object datives and to-datives differ not only syntacticallybut also semantically. The former entails the suggestion that the recipient possesses a transferredobject whereas the latter does not. Previous work on priming has generally overlooked thisphenomenon. In consequence, priming was originally considered as involving syntactic treestructures, not constructions with associated meanings. To explore whether semantics matters inpriming, an investigation was conducted into the priming effect of English dative constructionsin advanced Chinese-speaking learners of English. The results afford evidence for semanticpriming in that priming of structure is not independent of meaning.
作者 姜琳
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期59-67,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 广东外语外贸大学校级青年项目(项目批准号:GWQ09003) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金的资助(“不同认知层面接口的第二语言习得研究” 项目批准号:07JJD740067)
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Bock, K. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production[J].Cognitive Psychology 18: 355- 387. 被引量:1
  • 2Bock, K. 1989. Closed-class immanence in sentence production [J]. Cognition 31: 163-186. 被引量:1
  • 3Bock, K. & Z. Griffin. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 : 177-192. 被引量:1
  • 4Bock, K. & H. Loebell. 1990. Framing sentences [J]. Cognition 35: 1-39. 被引量:1
  • 5Bock, K., H. Loebell & R. Morey. 1992. From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft [J]. Psychological Review 99: 150-171. 被引量:1
  • 6Boyland, J. T. & J. R. Anderson. 1998. Evidence that syntactic priming is long-lasting [A]. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [C]. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1205. 被引量:1
  • 7Branigan, H., M. Picketing & A. Cleland. 1999. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay [J].Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6: 635-640. 被引量:1
  • 8Branigan, H., M. Picketing & A. Cleland. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue [J]. Cognition 75: B13-B25. 被引量:1
  • 9Bresnan, J. & T. Nikitina. 2003. On the gradience of the dative alternation [R]. On-line, http://lfgstanford.edu/bresnan/download.html. 被引量:1
  • 10Chang, F., K. Bock & A. Goldberg. 2003. Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? [J].Cognition 90: 29-49. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

共引文献179

同被引文献307

引证文献22

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部