摘要
美国宪法解释中的原旨主义理论是以宪法文本中的作者意图为根据的解释理论,并不同于非原旨主义者所理解的意图主义和解释主义。这一理论在宪政价值上有利于维护宪法权威、增强人们对宪法文本的法律信仰;并且这一理论以潜在的主权理论作为政治哲学上的理论依据,有利于反驳非原旨主义者的批评,可以消解美国宪法解释中的"麦迪逊困境"。原旨主义理论通过区分宪法解释和宪法阐释,明确了宪法解释的边界,最大限度地实现了宪法解释的去政治化,维护宪法解释的司法属性,为处理释宪和修宪的关系提供了理论根据。
In the context of legal interpretation, interpretive turn suggests that interpretation is the ontology basis of significance but not only the methodology of humanities. However, the relativism legal hermeneutics meets the doubt from rigid constitutionalism. On the basis of legal hermeneutics, the history in historical interpretation is the effective history and interpretation in it is assertive one. The purpose of historical interpretation is to find proper answer for current situation and it is not in the counter-majoritarian dilemma, for we should locate democracy in a new perspective, and keep a dynamic perspective of historical interpretation,
出处
《河南广播电视大学学报》
2009年第1期34-37,共4页
Journal of Henan Radio & TV University
关键词
原旨主义
宪法解释
宪法阐释
民主
麦迪逊困境
Constitutionalinterpretation
ConstitutionalConstruction
TheCounter--majoritarianDilemma
Originalist
Democracy
