摘要
北宋易学史上,司马光、王安石皆以扬雄之学为切入点,因《太玄经》而准《周易》,反映了儒学复兴进程中,中国学术转向"内在"的总需求。但是,二人尊扬之造次深浅、易学旨趣之远近,各有差异:温公治学,行贵于知,经由"《周易》—《太玄经》—《太玄注》"的思路,"心学"未见规模而"笔学"已成,"天人之论"未通而《资治通鉴》已大行于世,结果让易学做成了"涑水史学"的注脚。相反,"王学"建构,先知后行,力主回归原儒"乐天知命"、"天人合一"的易学精神,并经由"《周易》—《太玄经》—《孟子》"这一逻辑,贯通"五经"、"四书",为脱离佛道、重建心性道德之学,寻出了"内在性"的支撑。
In the Yi studies history of the Northern Song dynasty, SI-MA Guang （ 1019 - 1086） and WANG An--shi （ 1021 - 1086） both penetrated into the Yi studies from YANG Xiong＇s （53B. C. - 18A. D. ） Tai xuan （ the Great Mystery）. This reflects an academic demand for a turn toward innate realm studies in the revival of Confucianism in the Northern Song dynasty. However, the two scholars differ from each other in viewing YANG Xiong＇s achievements in Yi studies： SI-Ma Guang upheld practice over knowledge thirough the thread of Zhouyi--Tai xuan--Annotatien to Tai xuan, wrote Zi zhi tong jian （ General Mirror for the Aid of Government） which is published extensively in the later generations. His Yi-ology becomes the footnotes of his historiography. On the contrary, WANG An-shi emphasizes knowledge over practice and contends to return to the original Confucian Yi spirit of ＂optimism and being aware of destiny＂ and ＂the unity between heaven and humanity＂. Through Zhouyi - Tai xuan -Meng zi, WANG ran through the Five Classics and the Four Books, rebuilt Confucian ethology to shake off influence of Buddhism and Daoism, and found an innate bolster.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期27-32,70,共7页
Studies of Zhouyi
关键词
王安石
司马光
扬雄
易学
以《玄》准《易》
WANG An-shi
SI-MA Guang
YANG Xiong
Yi-ology
interpreting Yi by Tai xuan
