摘要
"预付人权论"尽管具有可以理解的动机,但其观点却是不能站住脚的。西方的"天赋人权"理论并不存在所谓的"危险逻辑",这种解读是错误理解"天赋人权"理论中的义务观念以及个别绝对化人权表述所致。"预付人权论"也完全称不上是"一种非西方的普遍人权理论",最多只不过是西方人权理论的另一种说法而已。
The mot vation of advancing the theory of credit human rights of Zhao Tingyang is accessible, while the opinion is untenable. So- called ＂ dangerous logic＂ claimed by Zhao does not exist in the occidental theory of innate human rights, and such an interpretation is resulted from his misapprehension of the obligation concept and the expression of individual absolute human right within the theory. In addition, his theory of credit human rights which could embody the impartiality is in effect a parlance of occidental human rights theory, and absolutely not a ＂non-occidental universal theory of human rights＂.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
2009年第1期91-95,共5页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
人权
预付人权论
义务
公正原则
human rights
credit human rights
obligation
principle of impartiality
