期刊文献+

美国金融危机的政府因素——奥地利学派商业周期理论的视角 被引量:13

Financial Crisis and Credit Expansion——in the view of Business Cycle Theory of Austrian Economic School
原文传递
导出
摘要 近期,美国次贷危机所引发的金融风暴成为众多学者的研究热点问题。大部分学者采用凯恩斯主义的典型观点,认为是市场失灵(需求不足)或者说政府的管制和干预不够造成了经济的萧条。为了应对萧条,政府应该尽早采取强有力的措施拯救市场,刺激经济。而在奥地利学派的米塞斯和罗斯巴德看来,大萧条的根源并不是经济的自由放任,恰恰是政府的干预,政府应对经济危机的正确做法不是去刺激经济、积极救市,而应该是放弃干预,采取自由的市场原则。本文试图就奥地利学派的商业周期理论来解读这次金融危机的根源和应对策略。 Recently, the financial crisis caused by Subprime mortgage becomes a hot topic among a great number of economists. Most of them who adopt the typical ideas of Keynesianism believe that the economic depression, which was due to market failure (shortage of effective demand) or inadequate regulations and interventions made by government, should be rescued by governmental forceful practices promptly. While, in the view of Austrian Economic School, the ultimate cause of the depression was not laissez- faire, but governmental interventions, so the proper actions to cope with the depression are to stop government intervention and adhere to the flee market principle rather than to take some active measures to stimulate economy. Applying with the business cycle theory of Austrian Economic School, this article tries to interpret the origin of the crisis and discuss how to tackle with it. The whole article is divided into 3 parts: the first part gives a brief introduction to the business cycle theory of Austrian Economic School and a discussion related to the theories of Keynesianism . Then the second part particularly illustrates the root cause of the crisis, and puts forward the policies which are held by Austrian Economic School as the settlements. The last part focus on present finance environment and renovation problems in China and points out that the reform of the free mar- ket direction should be insisted.
作者 黄雄
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第1期1-7,共7页 Finance & Economics
关键词 奥地利学派 金融危机 次贷危机 商业周期 凯恩斯主义 Austrian Economic School Financial Crisis Subprime Mortgage Business Cycle Theory Keynesianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[奥]米塞斯(Mises,Ludwigvon).人的行为[M].夏道平译.台北:台湾远流出版公司,1991. 被引量:1
  • 2Mises, Ludwig von, 1996, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute; 4th edition. 被引量:1
  • 3[美]罗斯巴德(Rothbard,Murray N.).美国大萧条[M].谢华育译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2003. 被引量:1
  • 4Rothbard, Murray N., 2000, America' s Great Depression, Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute; Fifth edition. 被引量:1
  • 5[英]凯恩斯(Keynes,John Maynard).就业利息和货币通论[M].徐毓枬译.北京:商务印书馆,1997. 被引量:1
  • 6新华网财经版,2008年10月07日,“专访世行副行长林毅夫:金融危机给世界两大教训”,参考网址http://news.xiuhuauet.com/fortune/2008-1O/07/content-10159114.htm. 被引量:1
  • 7陈志武,2008年7月9日,“历史上的货币发行权并不集中在政府手中”,《中国改革30年》新书发布暨2008经济问题点评会,参考网址:http://business.sohu.com/s2008/gsm30y/. 被引量:1
  • 821世纪经济报道,2008年9月22日,“美国金融危机:根源与教训”,参考网址:http://chenzhiwu.blog.sohu.com/100443706.html 被引量:1
  • 9Mises, Ludwig von, 2003, Epistemological Problems of Economics, translated by George Reisman, Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig van Mises Institute, 3rd edition. 被引量:1
  • 10米塞斯,《经济学认识论问题》,梁小民译,北京:中国经济科学出版社2001年版. 被引量:1

同被引文献100

引证文献13

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部