摘要
通过对"合本"与"子注"相关文献的考察,认为两者属于不同性质的概念。以"广义合本子注"为线索,进一步指出陈寅恪先生"合本子注"概念中的"子注"实为"子本"。"合本子注"的提法不够严谨,其含义实等同于"合本"。最后指出,陈氏从佛学而非经学中寻找《洛阳伽蓝记》等书的体裁渊源,与其对史料的重视有关。
The documents of Heben and Zihu illustrated that Heben and Zihu are two different conceptions. Hebenzizhu created by Chen Yinke is not an exact conception, its meaning equals to Heben. Only several chapters of Luoyangqielanji consist with Hebenzizhu. Because of attaching importance to the historical literature, Chen explored the formal original of Luoyangqielanji from the Buddhism.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第12期84-88,共5页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
