摘要
以北京市海淀区的生活垃圾收运和分类为例,运用层次分析法(AHP)对混合收集运输、分类收集运输而转运站功能不变、分类收集运输且转运站功能改变3种方案进行综合比较分析,探讨与垃圾分类趋势相适应的城市生活垃圾收运模式.结果表明,混合收集运输为最差方案;分类收集运输并且改变转运站功能为最优方案,而分类收集运输而转运站功能不变可作为最优与最差方案的过渡方案.
Classified collection and transportation of municipal solid wastes （MSW） are imperative for big cities in China. Taking Haidian district, Beijing as an example of this study compared three MSW collection and transportation patterns by using the analytical hierarchy process （AHP） to explore the suitable pattern matching with classified collection trend. The three patterns were non-classified collection and transportation （pattern 1）, classified collection and transportation with fixed function of transfer station （pattern 2） and classified collection and transportation with alternative function of transfer station （pattern 3）. Pattern 1 was least suitable while pattern 3 suits the best. Pattern 2 could be used as the transitional pattern between pattern 1 and 3.
出处
《中国环境科学》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第9期838-842,共5页
China Environmental Science
关键词
层次分析法
城市生活垃圾
分类收集
方案选优
analytical hierarchy process （AHP）
municipal solid waste
collection of classificated wastes
pattern optimization
