摘要
关于被害人同意在犯罪论体系中的地位,德国刑法学界历来有"二元论"和"一元论"之争。对于我国主张全面引入大陆法系犯罪论体系的"革命派"而言,需要审慎思考"一元论"对刑法学理论发展的深度影响;对于主张维持"四要件"基本格局的"改良派"而言,也可以从"一元论"中汲取资源,将被害人同意纳入"四要件"框架内予以重新解释。此外,笔者认为以同意的体系性地位之争为辐射源,可以从中引申出关于法益概念以及问题性思考等具有一般性意义、需要各种立场共同回应的深层次问题。
With respect of the systematic position of the victim＇ s consent, there is always existing dispute between the ＂monistic theory＂ and ＂dualistic theory＂, As for the revolutionists who advocate adopting of continent crime system thoroughly, it is necessary to consider the deep impact for criminal theory deriving from the monistic theory. As for the reformists who allege maintaining basic structure of the ＂four elements＂ theory, the monistic theory can also offer resources to settle systematic problems. Furthermore, the dispute of systematic position of the victim＇ s consent will contribute to reconsider some fundamental questions such as the concept of legal - interests and etc.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期104-118,共15页
China Legal Science
