摘要
随着经济环境、市场态势、反垄断价值目标的变化和主流经济思潮的更替,美国反垄断违法判定原则经历了从"本身违法"到"合理推定"的演进。20世纪70年代末期以来,美国反垄断法适用有所宽松,本身违法原则的适用范围有所减小,合理推定原则适用增多,并且在反垄断政策的实施中,法院开始不再明确区分这两大原则,而是同时考虑这两个原则,逐步实现了由二元判定模式向一元序列判定模式的转变。美国反垄断违法判定原则的演进历程对中国反垄断政策的制定和实施具有一定的启示作用。
With the change of economic environment, market trend and antitrust objectives and the turnover of the mainstream economics thoughts, the principles of convicted of unlawful in the process of antitrust experienced from per se rule to reasonable rule. After the end of the 1970s, the implement of American antitrust became liberal and the application of per se rule reduced but reasonable rule expanded. The principles of convicted of unlawful in the process of antitrust changed gradually from the two dimensional analysis mode with per se rule and reasonable rule opposing to each other to one dimensional series analysis mode with reasonable analysis on various levels from 1990s.
出处
《华东经济管理》
CSSCI
2008年第9期154-158,共5页
East China Economic Management
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(项目编号:06JZD0015)
山东省社会科学规划研究项目(07JDD002)
山东省软科学项目(2007RK054)的阶段性成果
关键词
违法判定原则
本身违法原则
合理推定原则
演进
principles of convicted of unlawful
perserule
reasonable rule
evolvement
