摘要
“本身违法”与“合理法则”是美国反垄断法中的一对重要法则,两者各有其相对独立的适用范围。“本身违法”适用于价格固定、市场划分、联合抵制、搭售安排及转售价格维持等案件,“合理法则”适用于纵向非价格限制、联营、企业合并等案件。20世纪80年代,受芝加哥学派思想的影响,“合理法则”与“本身违法”的适用范围有所模糊。由于美国是一个多元社会,而“本身违法”与“合理法则”具有重要的协调反垄断法多元价值目标冲突之功能,所以,两者的适用范围仍清晰可辨。
Per se illegal and rule of reason are important rules of AMA of America, and their covers are relatively independent. Per se illegal covers horizontal price fixing, horizontal market division, boycott, tying arrangement and resell price maintaining etc, and rule of reason mainly covers vertical non-price restrict, joint venture and merger. In 1980, the covers of rule of reason and per se illegal had been blurred because of Chicago School thought＇ s impact on the Supreme Court. However there are diverse aims of value in America, and per se illegal and rule of reason could harmonize various conflicts of values that embodies in the AMA of America, so their covers still Can be discerned.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第10期122-126,共5页
Hebei Law Science
