摘要
2007年《呐喊》、《彷徨》研究中,刘九生、逄增玉的《阿Q正传》研究,靳新来的《狂人日记》研究,原鹏的《孔乙己》研究,魏韶华的《祝福》研究皆能新人耳目,启人深思;《故事新编》研究中,王富仁、江弱水对于《铸剑》的理解可谓别具一格;《野草》研究共分三大部分,刘继业的文章堪称《野草》研究史上的优秀之作,从哲学、诗学解读《野草》的文章所在多有,汪卫东有关《复仇》(其二)、王乾坤有关《影的告别》的解读也颇有特色;李冬木的《阿金》研究其小题大做的论述方法可能更值得注意;毕绪龙有关鲁迅序跋文体的研究可谓独具眼光;有关鲁迅、茅盾贺红军信的论争可能还会持续下去。
Research made by Liu Jiusheng on The story of Ah Q and A Madman＇s Diary by Ji xinlai ,have infused new energy into the discussion about LuXun＇s Cryout and Hesitation during 2007. So do Yuan Peng＇s Kong Yiji and Wei Shaohua＇s The New -Year Sacrifice. Wang Furen, Jiang Ruoshui have a distinctive understanding of Forging the Swords. The studies on Wild Grass are classified into three parts, Liu Jiye＇s paper is regarded as an excellent work in the history of research on Wild Grass. There are also some studies on Wild Grass from philosophical, poetic perspectives. Wang Weidong ＇s interpretation of Revenge （2） and Wang Qiankun＇s study on Farewell of Shadow are also distinctive. Li Dongmu＇s discussion on the fussy narration in Ah Jin deserves more attention. Bi Xulong shows his originality in the study on the style of Lu Xun ＇s preface and postscript. The argumentation about Lu Xun and Mao Dun＇s letter to Red Army will continue.
出处
《泰山学院学报》
2008年第4期39-44,共6页
Journal of Taishan University
关键词
鲁迅
述评
视角
文体
论争
Lu Xun
Review
Perspective
Style
Argumentation.
