摘要
刑法保护知识产权的正当性,从外在现实需要而言,既是全球化的视野下知识产权刑法保护的法律趋同化的要求,也是国际法视野下条约必须信守原则的国际义务的要求。从内在理论基础而言,财产法视野下知识产权的权利脆弱性和易受侵犯性,以及经济学视野下侵犯知识产权行为的低风险性和高收益性决定了知识产权对刑法保护的强烈需求;同时,刑事政策视野下道德和"第一次法"保护知识产权的无效性,决定了"第二次法"——作为保障法的刑法的合理介入。
The legitimacy of penal protection of IPR is based on a series of interior or exterior reasons. The external requirements are that criminal laws in the fields of IPR tend to reach unanimity with globalization and the principle of ‘The treaty must be preserved＇ embodies international duty in the field of international law. Internal theoretical basis is the vulnerability and violability of IPR in property law or a clamor for penal protection of IPR based on low - risk and high - income acts of infringing IPR economically. Meanwhile, the ineffeetivity of ‘First Law＇ and moral protection of IPR justify the intervention of ‘Second Law＇ , the penal law, as the security act.
出处
《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第2期50-56,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition
基金
教育部人文社科基金(06JJD820018)
