期刊文献+

基于公平心理的报酬契约设计及代理成本分析 被引量:21

Payment Contract Design and Agency Cost Analysis Based on Fairness Preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对标准契约理论在设计报酬契约时忽略了公平心理因素这一问题,本研究以行为契约理论为工具,设计了引入公平心理之后的最优报酬契约,并进一步分析了公平心理对激励效率的影响。理论分析表明:公平心理较弱时,最优报酬契约是团队相对主义契约,其中公平心理会导致公平租金和公平风险补偿两种激励效率损失;公平心理较弱时,最优报酬契约是团队平均主义契约,其中公平心理只会导致公平风险补偿一种激励效率损失。这些研究结论对企业设计报酬契约具有重要参考意义,比如企业应该对公平心理强弱不同的员工设计和提供不同结构形式的报酬契约。 Aiming at the problem that classical contract theory ignores fairness preference in the course of designing payment contract, this paper researches and designs the optimal payment contract based on fairness preference by behavioral contract theory, and analyses the influence of fairness preference on incentive efficiency. The theoretic analysis indicates that the optimal contract under weak fairness preference is the team contact of relativism, by which the fairness preference leads to two kinds of incentive efficiency loss, the fairness rent and the compensation for fairness risk, while the optimal contract under strong fairness preference is the team contact of equalitarianism, by which the fairness preference leads to only one kind of incentive efficiency loss, the compensation for fairness risk. All the above research conclusions are important for enterprise to design payment contract. For example, enterprise should offer different payment contracts according to employees endowed with fairness preferences of different strength.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 2008年第2期58-63,68,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(07XJL004)
关键词 公平心理 报酬契约设计 激励效率损失 行为契约理论 fairness preference payment contract design incentive efficiency loss behavioral contract theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1罗宾斯·斯蒂芬.管理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997. 被引量:2
  • 2Fehr E, Schmidt A. Theories of fairness and reciprocity: evidence and economic applications[ M]. Proceedings of World Congress of the Econometric Society Seattle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 3Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics[ J]. American Economic review, 1993, 83(5): 1281 - 1302. 被引量:1
  • 4Englmaier F, Wambach A. Contracts and inequity aversion [ Z]. Working Paper, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 5Englmaier F, Wambach A. Optimal contracts under inequity aversion [Z]. Working Paper, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 6Dur R, Glazer A. Optimal incentive contracts when workers envy their boss[Z]. Working Paper, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 7Biel PR. Inequity aversion and team incentives. Working Paper[Z], 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Itoh H. Moral hazard and other-regarding preferences[J].Japanese Economic Review, 2004, 55(2) : 18 - 55. 被引量:1
  • 9Grund C, Sliwka D. Envy and compassion in tournaments [J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2005, 14( 1 ) : 187 - 207. 被引量:1
  • 10Fehr E, Falk A. Psychological foundations of incentives [ J ]. European Economic Review, 2002, 46(3) : 687 - 724. 被引量:1

共引文献1

同被引文献364

引证文献21

二级引证文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部