摘要
17世纪初刊行的《利玛窦世界地图》在中韩日三国产生的影响各有不同。本文探究其原因,认为是由于历史上中韩日"世界"观念的差异,这种差异可以从三国的地图上见读,并做出具体分析。作者以朝鲜的天下图和日本的南瞻部洲图为主对本题做了论述。结论是:在中国,牢固的传统"天下"观使利氏地图熔入明清地图的中华中心主义大统;在朝鲜,变异的"天下"观仍坚持以中国为中心的"大总",利氏地图传入较早却影响有限,而特殊的"天下图"得以产生和流传;在日本,利氏地图虽也遭到传统的"三国"观的拒斥,但实际上得到较为深广的"受容",后来其南瞻部洲图也在较大程度上接受了西方的世界观念。
The influence of Matteo Ricci＇s world map published in early 17th Century was different in China, Korea and Japan. This paper explores the diversity and thinks the answer lies in the different world idea of the three countries, which could be found on their maps. This paper mainly discusses the Korean Ch＇onhado （ 天下图） and the Japanese Nansenbushu Zu （南瞻部洲图）, and is concluded that in China, the deep-rootedly traditional conception “tianxia”（天下） leads Ricci＇s world map overwhelmed by the China-Centralism on the maps made in the Ming and Qing dynasties; in Korea, the conception of Taech＇ong（大总） recognizes China as the center, the influence of Ricci＇s map limited, and the special Ch＇onhado can be made and spreaded; and in Japan, Ricci＇s map is actually accepted and accommodated more extensively, although it is expelled by the conventional “Trine Nation Idea.” Later, the Western world-vision receives its wider acceptance on Nansenbushu Zu.
出处
《复旦学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期30-41,共12页
Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）
