摘要
目的:检验Aitken拖延问卷在中国大学生中的适用性,以期提供一个用于评价大学生学业拖延行为的工具。方法:采用随机抽样的方式,给380名大学生施测。结果:各项目与总分的平均相关0.482,鉴别指数0.327;Cronbachα系数为0.802;间隔1周后的重测信度为0.705。量表实证效度是以学生5次完成作业天数的平均值作为反映拖延行为的指标,用积差相关方法计算本量表总分和平均完成作业的天数之间的相关系数为0.727;并采用王磊的自我效能量表作为一个评价拖延行为的效标,结果显示它们之间存在中等程度相关。用拖延量表对学生完成作业拖延行为进行预测的回归方程为=-2.922+0.146X,测定系数r2=0.529。结论:Aitken拖延问卷在我国大学生样本应用结果表明该量表的区分度、信度和效度,符合心理测量学的标准。
Objective： This research attempted to examine and revise the Aitken Procrastination Inventory （API） in China, and applied to college students, with a view to providing an evaluation tooi in the research of procrastination. Methods： Random sampling method was used to choose 380 college students to administer the questionnaires. Results： The results of this study showed the Cronbach＇s reliability coefficient was 0.802; the test-retest reliability after one week interval was 0.705. The empirical validity of this scale was shown by the average of days： the students accomplished five times of homework. Pearson＇s correlation of calculation of the total scores of the scale and the average number of days was 0.727. The self-efficacy scale of Wang Lei was used as a criterion for evaluating the delay; the results showed that there existed a moderate correlation between them. The regression equation used to predict the students＇ procrastination, was Y=-2.922＋0.146X, r^2=0.529, which meant the API could explain 52.9% variance about actual procrastination behavior. Conclusion： The results of this research has proved that the API has good differentiation, reliability and validity applied to college student sample in China.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2008年第1期22-23,76,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词
拖延问卷
大学生
信度
效度
Procrastination Scale
College students
Reliability
Validity
Regression equation
