期刊文献+

舒芬太尼和芬太尼用于下肢骨科手术静脉自控镇痛的对比研究 被引量:3

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanyl-nefopam and fentanyl-nefopam after lower limb orthopedic surgery:a comparative study.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较等效剂量国产舒芬太尼和芬太尼复合盐酸奈福泮用于下肢骨科手术患者静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)的效果及不良反应。方法选择ASAⅠ,Ⅱ级,年龄20~60岁,择期全麻下肢骨科手术患者60例,随机分为舒芬太尼组(S组)和芬太尼组(F组)各30例。术毕即接电子泵行PCIA。S组:舒芬太尼100μg、奈福泮100mg、格拉斯琼3mg、生理盐水稀释至100ml;F组:芬太尼1mg、奈福泮100mg、格拉斯琼3mg、生理盐水稀释至100ml。背景剂量1.5ml/h,PCA剂量1.0ml,锁定时间15min。记录术后4,12,24,48h的血压、心率、呼吸频率、SpO2;静息及活动时的疼痛评分(VAS法);镇痛、恶心、呕吐评分及尿潴留、皮肤瘙瘁、呼吸抑制等不良反应的发生情况;记录患者PCA总按压次数;记录患者镇痛满意评分及其它镇痛药物的情况及其剂量和次数。结果术后血压、心率、呼吸频率、SpO2在两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。S组术后4,12,24,48h的VAS评分均明显低于F组(P〈0.01)。镇静评分在两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。S组术后恶心及呕吐者明显少于F组(P〈0.05)。术后4,12,24h时间点S组的按压次数明显少于F组(P〈0.05)。S组术后镇痛满意度评分明显优于F组(P〈0.05)。结论国产舒芬太尼复合奈福沣用于下肢骨科手术静脉自控镇痛,其效果优于芬太尼复合奈福沣静脉自控镇痛,无明显不良反应。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sulfentanlyl-nefopam and fentanyl-netopam for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)after lower limb surgery with general anesthesia. Methods 60 ASA grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ patients aged 20 - 60 undergoing lower limb surgery with general aneathesia were randomly divided into two groups :sufentanil-nefopam( S , n = 30)versus fentanil-nefopam( F , n = 30). The patients in group S received 1μg/ml sufentanil, 1 mg/ml nefopam plus 30 μg/ml granisetron, with a total volume of 100 ml,in group F 10μg/ml fentanyl, 1mg/ml nefopam plus 30μg/ml granisetron. PCIA parameters were a bolus dose of 1.0ml,loekout time of 15 minutes and continuous infusion of 1.5ml/h. Vital signs including MAP,HR, RR,SpO2,the pain intensity according to visual analogue scalc(VAS)at rest and during mobilization,satisfaction,sedation scores and side effects such as nausea,vomiting,urine retention,pruritus, breath depression were recorded at 4, 12,24 and 48h postoperatively; the total number of PCA and other analgesics were be recorded.Results The tv,o groups were comparable with respect to demographic data,duration of surgery and duration of anesthesia.There were no differenee of MAP,HR,RR, SpO2 between the two groups. The VAS scores at rest and during mobilization was lower in groups S than in group F( P 〈 0.01 ) . No significant difference was observed in sedation scores between the two groups. The total number of PCA in group F was more than that in group S( P 〈 0.05) .The scores of satisfaction of postoperative analgesia was lower in group F than in group S( P 〈 0.05) .The incidence of nausea or vomiting in group S was lower than that in group F( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion PCIA with sufentanyl-nefopam provides better efficacy of analgesia with lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than with fentanyl-nefopam in postoperative patients with lower llmb surgery.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2008年第3期280-282,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 舒芬太尼 芬太尼 奈福泮 静脉自控镇痛 sufentanil fentanil nefopam patient-eontrolled intravenous analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1魏绪庚,田素杰主编..麻醉治疗学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1998:893.
  • 2Gepts E, Sharer SL, Camu F, et al. Linearity of pharmacokineties and model estimation of sufentanil[J] .Anesthesiology, 1995,83(6) :1194 - 1204 被引量:1
  • 3Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Hynynen M, et al. Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth,2000,85 (4) : 533 - 540 被引量:1
  • 4Sinatra RS, Sevarlno FB, Paige D. Patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil:a comparison of two different methods of administration[J]. J Clin Anesm, 1996,8(2) : 123 - 129 被引量:1
  • 5王红珠,王惠琴.不同浓度舒芬太尼用于术后静脉自控镇痛的比较[J].临床医学,2007,27(1):28-29. 被引量:22
  • 6Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of ' multimodal' or ' balanced analgesia' in postoperative pain treatment[J]. Anesth Analg, 1993,77 (5) :1048 - 1056 被引量:1
  • 7林春水,卢刚,阮骆阳,古妙宁.舒芬太尼和芬太尼用于开胸术后病人自控静脉镇痛的比较研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(2):240-241. 被引量:40

二级参考文献9

  • 1周军,孟凡民,周旭.芬太尼与可塞风在患者自控镇痛方面的应用[J].中国临床医学,2004,11(6):1118-1119. 被引量:6
  • 2佘守章.新型阿片类药物在病人自控镇痛中的应用[J].麻醉与监护论坛,2005,12(1):34-39. 被引量:39
  • 3[3]Poopalalingam R,Chow MY,Wong LT.Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after thoracic and upper abdominal surgery using sufentanil with and without bupivacaine 0.125%[J].Singapore Med J,2003,44(3):126-30. 被引量:1
  • 4[5]Menigaux C,Guignard B,Fletcher D,et al.More epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief[J].Anesth Analg,2001,93(2):472-6. 被引量:1
  • 5[7]Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KL,et al.Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[J].Anesth Analg,1990,70(1):8-15. 被引量:1
  • 6[8]Fugare F,Dorle P,Veillette Y.Evalution of the activity of postoperative analgesia department in canadian hosipitol[J].Ann Fr Anesth Rev,1996,15(2):313-7. 被引量:1
  • 7[9]Bibby PF.Postoperative nausea management and patient controlled analgesia[J].Br J Nurs,2001,11 (4):775-80. 被引量:1
  • 8Wilde MI, Markham A. Ondamsetrom:a review of its pharmacology and preliminary clinical findings in novel applications[ J ]. Drugs, 1996,52 :773 - 794. 被引量:1
  • 9Bailey PL,Streisand JB,East KA,et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid - induced respiratory depression and anglgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[J]. Anesth Analg,1990,70:8 - 15. 被引量:1

共引文献59

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部