期刊文献+

66例亲属活体肾移植的临床观察 被引量:4

Related-living kidney transplantation:A case series of 66 patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨人类白细胞抗原(HLA)配型和抗HLA抗体检测在亲属活体肾移植的应用,及其与移植效果的关系。方法:移植受者及其亲属供体采用PCR—SSP进行HLA配型,移植术前行补体依赖微量细胞毒性试验(CDC)交叉配型,同时采用酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)方法筛查和监测受者的群体反应性抗体(PRA)。分析亲属活体供肾移植的临床效果。结果:够例受者接受了亲属活体供肾移植手术。63例术前抗HLA抗体检测为阴性,其中供受者HLA配型错配(MM)者0-3MM受者57例,3例(5.26%)发生肾功能延迟恢复(DGF),2例(3.51%)发生急性排斥(AR);HLA4~6MM受者6例中分别有1例(16.67%)和2例(33.33%)发生DGF和AR。HLA0~3MM组AR发生率显著性低于4~6MM组(P〈0.05)。而不同临床免疫抑制方案组之间AR发生率无显著性统计学差异(P〉0.05)。甲基泼尼松龙(MP)和抗人胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)冲击等治疗措施后,所有AR得以逆转。3例术前预致敏(PRA35%~87.5%)的受者,HLA2~3MM。1例致敏受者肾功能顺利恢复,PRA维持不变。另2例致敏受者术前自然或经血浆置换后PRA转阴,术后发生AR,ATG冲击治疗后肾功能也恢复正常,抗体有轻度反弹。结论:亲属活体供肾移植的组织配型良好,配合抗HLA抗体监测,使得受者移植的机会增加,排斥反应发生率低,但错配者多,术前致敏受者排斥反应发生率高,应加强围手术期处理。 Objective:To investigate the application of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and anti-HLA antibodies detection in the related- living kidney transplantation, and the relationship between HLA matching, antibodies detection and the outcomes of transplantation. Methodology: Sixty-six patients who had received related-living kidney transplantation were enrolled in this study. Their HLA were typed and matched by polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primer (PCR-SSP). The complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross-match was used between recipients and living-related donors pre-transplantation. The serum panel reactive antibodies (PRA) of recipients were screened and moni- tored with enzyme-linked immune absorbent (ELISA) assay. The clinical outcomes of related-living kidney transplantation were also analyzed. Results: Sixty-three cases were detected PRA negative pre-transplantation. In 57 cases with 0 - 3 HLA mismatch ( MM ), 3 (5.26%) developed delayed graft function (DGF) and 2 ( 3. 51% ) had acute rejection (AR). In 6 cases with HLA 4 -6 MM, 1 ( 16. 7% ) developed DGF and 2 (33. 3% ) had AR, respectively. The incidence of AR in HLA 0-3MM cases was significantly lower than that in HLA 4 -6 MM (P 〈0. 05), while there was no significant difference in the incidence of DGF. There was no significant difference in the cases with different clinical immunosuppres- sive therapy (P 〉0. 05 ). All of cases occurred AR were reversed by methylpredisone (MP) pulse therapy and anti-thymus globulin (ATG) treatments. 3 pre-sensitized recipients ( PRA 35% -87. 5% ), HLA 2 -3MM, were monitored by PRA detection to observe the dynamic variety of anti-HLA antibodies. One recovered as expected with PRA was no change with normal renal function. The others changed to PRA negative naturally or by plasmapheresis pre-transplantation, and developed AR post-transplantation, but returned normal kidney function after ATG treatment. Their antibodies were recu
出处 《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第1期9-13,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
关键词 肾移植 人类白细胞抗原 抗人类白细胞抗原抗体 亲属活体供肾 kidney transplantation human leukocyte antigen(HLA) anti-HLA antibodies living-related donor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2003,3:665 - 673. 被引量:1
  • 2张文彤等.统计工具SPSS11.0统计分析教程(基础篇).第1版.北京:希望电子出版社,2002.261-266. 被引量:1
  • 3曾凡军,刘斌,蒋继贫,张伟杰,林正斌,陈知水,明长生,朱兰,陈忠华.亲属活体肾移植101例分析[J].中华器官移植杂志,2006,27(5):265-267. 被引量:66
  • 4王亚伟,闵志廉.活体肾移植的几点体会[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2006,15(1):50-51. 被引量:5
  • 5谭建明 唐孝达 朱忠勇.特异性抗人类白细胞抗原抗体的筛选与临床应用.中华检验医学杂志,2000,23(2):100-102. 被引量:3
  • 6Kaplan B, Schold J, Meier-Kriesche HU. Overview of large database analysis in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2003,3 : 1052 - 1056. 被引量:1
  • 7Piazza A, Poggi E, Borrelli L, et al. Relevance of posttransplant HLA class Ⅰ and class Ⅱ antibodies on renal graft outcome. Trans- plant Proc, 2001 (33) :478 -480. 被引量:1
  • 8Cai J, Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation: Mechanism, prevention, and treatment. Hum Immunol, 2005,66:334 - 342. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

共引文献71

同被引文献64

  • 1何英,陆学东.液相芯片技术及其临床应用[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(12):1107-1108. 被引量:14
  • 2孙启全.肾移植致敏受者处理措施的选择[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2006,15(6):538-539. 被引量:8
  • 3黄刚,陈立中,王长希,费继光,邱江,傅茜,李军,邓素雄,陈国栋.标准HLA配型与氨基酸残基配型在再次肾移植中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2007,28(2):196-200. 被引量:1
  • 4Terasaki PI,Gjertson DW,Cecka JM,et al.Significance of the donor age effect on kidney transplants[J].Clin Transplant,1997,11 (5 Pt 1):366-372. 被引量:1
  • 5Kumar A,Verma BS,Srivastava A,et al.Long-term follow up of elderly donors in a live related renal transplant program[J].J Urol,2000,163 (6):1654-1658. 被引量:1
  • 6Morris PJ,Johnson RJ,Fuggle SV,et al.Analysis of factors that affect outcome of primary cadaveric renal transplantation in the UK.HLA Task Force of the Kidney Advisory Group of the United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA)[J].Lancet,1999,354 (9185):1147-1152. 被引量:1
  • 7De La Vega LS,Torres A,Bohorquez HE,et al.Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR[J].Kidney Int,2004,66 (4):1654-1661. 被引量:1
  • 8Kerr SR,Gillingham KJ,Johnson EM,et al.Living donors 》 55 years:to use or not to use?[J] Transplantation,1999,67 (7):999-1004. 被引量:1
  • 9Gill JS,Gill J,Rose C,et al.The older living kidney donor; part of the solution to the organ shortage[J].Transplantation,2006,82 (12):1662-1666. 被引量:1
  • 10Perico N,Ruggenenti P,Scalamogna M,et al.Tackling the shortage of donor kidneys:how to use the best that we have[J].Am J Nephrol,2003,23 (4):245-259. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部