摘要
目的探讨并比较动态脑电图(AEEG)及脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)在重症脑血管病患者预后评价中的作用。方法对52例重症脑血管病患者入院后48 h内行AEEG检测,同时48 h内予BAEP检查。结果AEEG检测对重症脑血管病预后的评估的敏感性(72.0%)、特异性(94.7%)和准确率(84.6%),均比BAEP的敏感性(51.9%)、特异性(71.0%)和准确率(57.7%)高。结论动态脑电图检查对重症脑血管病患者的预后评估有意义,价值优于脑干听觉诱发电位。
Objective To determine and compare the effect of ambulatory electroencephalography and auditory brainstem response at evaluation of prognosis of critical cerebral vascular disease. Methods 52 patients suffering from critical cerebral vascular disease were detected with ambulatory electroencephalography and auditory bralnstem response in 48 hours after hospitalization. Results The sensibility(72.0%),specificity(94.7%)and accuracy rate(84.6%) of AEEG were higher than the sensibility(51.9%) ,specificity(71.0%) and accuracy rate(57.7%) of BAEP at the evaluation of critical cerebral vascular disease. Conclusion Ambulatory electroencephalography has reliable significance at evaluation of prognosis of critical cerebral vascular disease. Its value is superior to auditory brainstem response.
出处
《淮海医药》
CAS
2008年第2期95-96,共2页
Journal of Huaihai Medicine
关键词
动态脑电图
脑干听觉诱发电位
重症脑血管病
预后
Ambulatory electroencephalography
Auditory brainstem response
Critical cerebral vascular disease
Prognosis