期刊文献+

坎地沙坦加氢氯噻嗪对轻中度高血压的疗效和安全性 被引量:8

Efficacy and Safety of the Compound of Candesartan Cilexetial and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Essential Hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价坎地沙坦加氢氯噻嗪(复方坎地沙坦酯片)对原发性高血压的降压疗效和安全性。方法对原发性高血压患者经过2周清洗期后,进入坎地沙坦酯片8 mg单药治疗期,对4周后血压未达标者(达标血压为<140/90 mm Hg),以随机、双盲双模拟、平行对照、多中心试验方法,分别服复方坎地沙坦酯片(坎地沙坦酯16.0 mg/氢氯噻嗪12.5 mg)或坎地沙坦酯片16 mg单药治疗8周。结果经过2周清洗期,共有392例进入单药治疗期,坎地沙坦酯8 mg单药治疗(n=353)2周后,血压下降值(10.2±0.6)/(6.5±5.7)mm Hg;4周的下降值为(10.8±10.9)/(6.6±6.1)mm Hg,4周血压达标率为15.3%(54/353例),组内比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.01)。在以后8周随机双盲对照期,复方坎地沙坦酯组(134例)与坎地沙坦酯单药组(142例)4周时的血压分别下降为(9.3±11.7)/(8.7±6.2)和(5.4±10.8)/(5.4±6.1)mm Hg;8周时为(11.1±11.2)/(10.7±6.6)和(7.8±11.1)/(7.8±6.3)mm Hg(组内及组间比较P<0.01)。随机期4周时联合治疗组血压达标率分别为64.9%(87/ 134),单药组为39.4%(56/142),8周时分别为79.9%(107/134)和51.4%(73/142)(组间比较P<0.01)。不良反应事件,在单药治疗期为6.2%(22/353),复方坎地沙坦组为2.9%(4/134),坎地沙坦酯组2.8%(4/142),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论复方坎地沙坦酯片较之单用坎地沙坦对原发性高血压患者有较好的降压效果和耐受性。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination of candesartan cilexetial and hydrochlorothiazide (16.0 mg/12. 5 mg) in patients with mild and moderate hypertension. Methods A 8 weeks, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was carried out. After 2 weeks wash-out phase, treatment started with once-daily 8 mg candesartan cilexetil in the 392 patients for 4 weeks (phase 1 study) ; if target sitting diastolic BP (SeDBP〈90 mm Hg) was not achieved, the dose were titrated to candesartan 16 mg alone or candesartan 16.0 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg pill once daily for 8 weeks(phase 2 study). Results The reduction of BP were 10.2±10.6/6.5±5.7 mm Hg after 4 weeks treatment of 8 mg candesartan cilexetial alone( n= 353), only 54 (15.3%) patients achieved the target DBP. During the consequential 8 weeks treatment, the antihypertensive effect of combined treatment(n=134) was much greater than that by candesartan alone(n=142) (11.1±11.2/10.7±6.6 mm Hg vs 7.8±11.1/7.8±6.3 mm Hg, P〈0.01). The number of patients who achieved the target DBP were 73/142(51.4%) by monotherapy vs 107/134 (79. 9%) by combined treatment (P〈0. 01). Patients were well tolerated in both groups with no difference in drug-related adverse events. Conlusion The combined candesartan cilexetiain and hydrochlorothiazide treatment is more effective and well tolerated in patients with mild and molderate hypertension than that by candesartan monotherapy.
出处 《中华高血压杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期120-123,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hypertension
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划课题(2006BAI14B07)
关键词 复方坎地沙坦酯片 高血压 降压疗效 安全性 Hypertension Candesartan cilexetial/hydrochlorothiazide Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1060-1064. 被引量:2620
  • 2Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension, 2003,42:239-246. 被引量:1
  • 3Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet,2000,29;356:366-372. 被引量:1
  • 4Howe P, Phillips P, Saini R, et al.The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Irbesartan Multicenter Study Group. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999,21:1373-1396. 被引量:1
  • 5中国高血压防治指南起草委员会.1999中国高血压防治指南[J].高血压杂志,2000,8:94-112. 被引量:6
  • 6European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens,2003,21:1011-1053. 被引量:1
  • 7Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.Lancet. 1998,351:1755-1762. 被引量:1
  • 8Dahl,J Hypertens,1993年,11卷,3期,S29页 被引量:1
  • 9Chiu A T,Biochem Biophys Res Commun,1990年,172卷,3期,1195页 被引量:1
  • 10黄洁,中华心血管病杂志,1999年,27卷,196页 被引量:1

共引文献140

同被引文献184

引证文献8

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部