摘要
科学思想要实现突破,就应当对各种假说持宽容态度,同时应当突破把西方话语体系作为唯一评价准则的藩篱,对非主流思想不能轻易斥之以"伪科学"之名。关于伪科学的界定,牵涉到对"科学"的界定。虽然关于科学内涵的认识众说不一,但对于非科学还是可以找出基本划界标准的,这就是完全不具备证实性和逻辑性(不仅指形式逻辑,还包括辩证逻辑),以及完全没有创新性。在中国语境中,伪科学属于非科学中带有刻意欺骗性的一种特殊形态。基于人类认识世界过程的复杂性,有的科学思想可能在开初很难得到验证,也很难为主流科学理喻,因此有必要把一般的"非科学"与"伪科学"进行适当区分,这样有利于给新思想特别是非西方形态的科学思想提供成长空间。
If the breakthrough is expected, we should bear the attitude of allowance with all kinds of hypothesis. Meanwhile, we should break through in the hedge that taking the Western describing system as the only evaluation standard. Pseudo science can not be easily named. When pseudo science is concerned, there must be the concern of science as well. Although there are different types of description of science, we can give the basic standard toward non science, that is, things that totally have no complete substantiation and logicality （Not only formal logic but also dialectical logic）, and have no innovation that can carry on the past and open a way for future. In Chinese context, pseudo science belongs to special type of non science with an intentionally cheating character. Considering the complexity of understanding the world, some science ideologies are hardly validated at the very beginning and taken for serious by mainstream science, so it is essential to differentiate the non-science and pseudo science properly for the sake of the creative ideology, especially the non-western modality scientific ideology getting the developable space.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第1期118-124,共7页
Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词
科学创新
科学理喻性
非科学
伪科学
多元科学观
creation in science
truth explanation character of science
non-science
pseudo science
pluralistic view in science
