期刊文献+

论《文选》选赋义例二则

On Two Cases of Fu Election in Literary Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《文选》是按文体选录各类文章佳作的诗文总集。其赋体的编排尚有一些问题值得探讨:《文选》于全部文体中列赋体为首位,体现出萧统自身的文学见解,同时又是受前人编排体例以及大赋体所处地位的双重影响的结果;《文选》将骚、赋分体,具有重要的首创意义,前人骚赋观念混淆不分,萧统别骚于赋反映出其明确的文体辨析意识。 "Literary Selection" are selected according to various articles style sweetheart of the poems collected. The scheduling of its Fu style still some issues worth exploring:" Literary Selection"lists Fu style at the first in all given out styles , it reflects Xiao Tong own literary insights, at the same time by their predecessors and Fu style presentation of the status of the results of the dual impact ;" Literary Selection "discriminates Fu style from Sao style , this initiative has very important significance, predecessors confused of the concept of Sao and Fu style, while the distinction of Sao and , Xiao Tong Fu by Xiao Tong clearly reflects his awareness of style discrimination.
作者 冯莉
出处 《齐鲁学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期112-115,共4页 Qilu Journal
关键词 《文选》 赋体 骚体 文体辨析 Literary Selection Fu style Sao style style discrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1章学诚著..文史通义 4[M].北京:中华书局,1985:304.
  • 2范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1958.75-76. 被引量:616
  • 3萧统.文选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社标点本,1986.. 被引量:232
  • 4何沛雄.《文选》选赋义例论略[A].中外学者文选学论集[C].北京:中华书局,1998. 被引量:1
  • 5曹道衡.文选学新论[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1997. 被引量:1
  • 6陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982.. 被引量:458
  • 7严可均.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文[M].北京:中华书局,1985. 被引量:14
  • 8杨明照.抱朴子外篇校笺[M].北京:中华书局,1991:184. 被引量:29
  • 9余嘉锡.世说新语笺疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1993.. 被引量:115
  • 10沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1987. 被引量:7

共引文献1806

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部