摘要
由于行政管理体制和司法体制不同,各个国家行政诉讼证明责任分配规则不尽相同。我国行政机关在行政程序中依职权调查案件事实,法官在行政诉讼程序中发挥比较积极的作用,决定行政诉讼证明责任分配规则与行政程序证明责任分配规则总体一致,但又不完全相同。行政诉讼以"谁主张谁举证"为证明责任分配基本原则。考虑到推定、行政认知等影响,行政诉讼证明责任分配规则有多样性,还存在证明责任倒置的情况。
Different country adopts different rule of burden of proof. In China, due to active role of administrative organ and people＇s court, the rule of burden of proof in administrative procedure is the same of administrative proceeding in general. Sometimes, it＇s different. The general principle of burden of proof in administrative proceeding is actori incumbit onus probandi. Administrative proceeding is complex, so burden of proof should be diversity. Other burden of proof exists in administrative proceeding, but it must be prescribed. Because of complication of public management, sometimes, judge should be empowered to adjust burden of proof among participants.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第1期117-122,共6页
Hebei Law Science
基金
2006年国家社科基金资助课题"行政程序证据规则研究"(06XFX005)的阶段性成果
关键词
证明责任
行政诉讼
行政程序
程序正义
burden of evidence
administrative proceeding
administrative procedure
due process
